block my android app from install on bluestack emulatorHow to restrict an APK not to get installed in Android Emulator/Simulator but in real device?Block emulators in android applicationFling gesture detection on grid layoutWhy is the Android emulator so slow? How can we speed up the Android emulator?Android emulator-5554 offlineHow do you install an APK file in the Android emulator?Android SDK installation doesn't find JDKHow do I rotate the Android emulator display?Android error: Failed to install *.apk on device *: timeoutRunning the new Intel emulator for AndroidCan't start Eclipse - Java was started but returned exit code=13Alternatives to android default emulator

Stopping power of mountain vs road bike

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?

Combinations of multiple lists

Were any external disk drives stacked vertically?

How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?

How can I fix/modify my tub/shower combo so the water comes out of the showerhead?

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

In Romance of the Three Kingdoms why do people still use bamboo sticks when paper had already been invented?

Took a trip to a parallel universe, need help deciphering

Doing something right before you need it - expression for this?

What do you call someone who asks many questions?

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

Today is the Center

Is it possible to run Internet Explorer on OS X El Capitan?

What is the intuition behind short exact sequences of groups; in particular, what is the intuition behind group extensions?

What to put in ESTA if staying in US for a few days before going on to Canada

Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?

Alternative to sending password over mail?

90's TV series where a boy goes to another dimension through portal near power lines

What killed these X2 caps?

Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?

How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?

Reserved de-dupe rules



block my android app from install on bluestack emulator


How to restrict an APK not to get installed in Android Emulator/Simulator but in real device?Block emulators in android applicationFling gesture detection on grid layoutWhy is the Android emulator so slow? How can we speed up the Android emulator?Android emulator-5554 offlineHow do you install an APK file in the Android emulator?Android SDK installation doesn't find JDKHow do I rotate the Android emulator display?Android error: Failed to install *.apk on device *: timeoutRunning the new Intel emulator for AndroidCan't start Eclipse - Java was started but returned exit code=13Alternatives to android default emulator






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








0















I'm new to create something like that



but I wanna to stop people install my app on emulators especially bluestack.



when I googled it I found this and this but both of them failed with me and it still installing on bluestack.



tried to use this lib too but failed



so I hope anyone help me solve this










share|improve this question
























  • You can't technically block it from installing, and I highly recommend you don't spend time on this. Rooting the device (emulated or otherwise) offers a huge world of APK modifications, including removing emulator detection.

    – Zoe
    Mar 9 at 8:53











  • but, what about Build architecture I mean exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android?

    – Moustaf EL-Saghier
    Mar 9 at 21:18

















0















I'm new to create something like that



but I wanna to stop people install my app on emulators especially bluestack.



when I googled it I found this and this but both of them failed with me and it still installing on bluestack.



tried to use this lib too but failed



so I hope anyone help me solve this










share|improve this question
























  • You can't technically block it from installing, and I highly recommend you don't spend time on this. Rooting the device (emulated or otherwise) offers a huge world of APK modifications, including removing emulator detection.

    – Zoe
    Mar 9 at 8:53











  • but, what about Build architecture I mean exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android?

    – Moustaf EL-Saghier
    Mar 9 at 21:18













0












0








0


1






I'm new to create something like that



but I wanna to stop people install my app on emulators especially bluestack.



when I googled it I found this and this but both of them failed with me and it still installing on bluestack.



tried to use this lib too but failed



so I hope anyone help me solve this










share|improve this question
















I'm new to create something like that



but I wanna to stop people install my app on emulators especially bluestack.



when I googled it I found this and this but both of them failed with me and it still installing on bluestack.



tried to use this lib too but failed



so I hope anyone help me solve this







android






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 9 at 8:52









Zoe

13.2k85386




13.2k85386










asked Mar 8 at 23:41









Moustaf EL-SaghierMoustaf EL-Saghier

14414




14414












  • You can't technically block it from installing, and I highly recommend you don't spend time on this. Rooting the device (emulated or otherwise) offers a huge world of APK modifications, including removing emulator detection.

    – Zoe
    Mar 9 at 8:53











  • but, what about Build architecture I mean exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android?

    – Moustaf EL-Saghier
    Mar 9 at 21:18

















  • You can't technically block it from installing, and I highly recommend you don't spend time on this. Rooting the device (emulated or otherwise) offers a huge world of APK modifications, including removing emulator detection.

    – Zoe
    Mar 9 at 8:53











  • but, what about Build architecture I mean exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android?

    – Moustaf EL-Saghier
    Mar 9 at 21:18
















You can't technically block it from installing, and I highly recommend you don't spend time on this. Rooting the device (emulated or otherwise) offers a huge world of APK modifications, including removing emulator detection.

– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:53





You can't technically block it from installing, and I highly recommend you don't spend time on this. Rooting the device (emulated or otherwise) offers a huge world of APK modifications, including removing emulator detection.

– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:53













but, what about Build architecture I mean exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android?

– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:18





but, what about Build architecture I mean exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android?

– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:18












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














here is my idea, first why not try to check for SIM number and deny it whoever has none,



on Java:



TelephonyManager telemamanger = (TelephonyManager) getSystemService(Context.TELEPHONY_SERVICE);
String getSimSerialNumber = telemamanger.getSimSerialNumber();
String getSimNumber = telemamanger.getLine1Number();


Enable permission in Manifest.xml



<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE"/>


If that step fails because of User Modifications on their emulators try to check if the app is running on emulator,



 public static boolean isEmulator() 


If isEmulator() == true then the app should be closed.



Hope this helps!






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    I suggest that an AlertDialog pops up before closing just to tell the user why the app is being closed

    – Sagar
    Mar 9 at 1:55











  • Wouldn't the first one also block tablets? Seems like a horrible idea blocking an entire platform over emulator concerns.

    – Zoe
    Mar 9 at 8:51











  • I need it not to install. I think about exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android what is ur opinion in it?

    – Moustaf EL-Saghier
    Mar 9 at 21:19











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55072506%2fblock-my-android-app-from-install-on-bluestack-emulator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














here is my idea, first why not try to check for SIM number and deny it whoever has none,



on Java:



TelephonyManager telemamanger = (TelephonyManager) getSystemService(Context.TELEPHONY_SERVICE);
String getSimSerialNumber = telemamanger.getSimSerialNumber();
String getSimNumber = telemamanger.getLine1Number();


Enable permission in Manifest.xml



<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE"/>


If that step fails because of User Modifications on their emulators try to check if the app is running on emulator,



 public static boolean isEmulator() 


If isEmulator() == true then the app should be closed.



Hope this helps!






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    I suggest that an AlertDialog pops up before closing just to tell the user why the app is being closed

    – Sagar
    Mar 9 at 1:55











  • Wouldn't the first one also block tablets? Seems like a horrible idea blocking an entire platform over emulator concerns.

    – Zoe
    Mar 9 at 8:51











  • I need it not to install. I think about exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android what is ur opinion in it?

    – Moustaf EL-Saghier
    Mar 9 at 21:19















1














here is my idea, first why not try to check for SIM number and deny it whoever has none,



on Java:



TelephonyManager telemamanger = (TelephonyManager) getSystemService(Context.TELEPHONY_SERVICE);
String getSimSerialNumber = telemamanger.getSimSerialNumber();
String getSimNumber = telemamanger.getLine1Number();


Enable permission in Manifest.xml



<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE"/>


If that step fails because of User Modifications on their emulators try to check if the app is running on emulator,



 public static boolean isEmulator() 


If isEmulator() == true then the app should be closed.



Hope this helps!






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    I suggest that an AlertDialog pops up before closing just to tell the user why the app is being closed

    – Sagar
    Mar 9 at 1:55











  • Wouldn't the first one also block tablets? Seems like a horrible idea blocking an entire platform over emulator concerns.

    – Zoe
    Mar 9 at 8:51











  • I need it not to install. I think about exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android what is ur opinion in it?

    – Moustaf EL-Saghier
    Mar 9 at 21:19













1












1








1







here is my idea, first why not try to check for SIM number and deny it whoever has none,



on Java:



TelephonyManager telemamanger = (TelephonyManager) getSystemService(Context.TELEPHONY_SERVICE);
String getSimSerialNumber = telemamanger.getSimSerialNumber();
String getSimNumber = telemamanger.getLine1Number();


Enable permission in Manifest.xml



<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE"/>


If that step fails because of User Modifications on their emulators try to check if the app is running on emulator,



 public static boolean isEmulator() 


If isEmulator() == true then the app should be closed.



Hope this helps!






share|improve this answer















here is my idea, first why not try to check for SIM number and deny it whoever has none,



on Java:



TelephonyManager telemamanger = (TelephonyManager) getSystemService(Context.TELEPHONY_SERVICE);
String getSimSerialNumber = telemamanger.getSimSerialNumber();
String getSimNumber = telemamanger.getLine1Number();


Enable permission in Manifest.xml



<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE"/>


If that step fails because of User Modifications on their emulators try to check if the app is running on emulator,



 public static boolean isEmulator() 


If isEmulator() == true then the app should be closed.



Hope this helps!







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 9 at 1:53

























answered Mar 9 at 1:14









RoshanRoshan

659417




659417







  • 1





    I suggest that an AlertDialog pops up before closing just to tell the user why the app is being closed

    – Sagar
    Mar 9 at 1:55











  • Wouldn't the first one also block tablets? Seems like a horrible idea blocking an entire platform over emulator concerns.

    – Zoe
    Mar 9 at 8:51











  • I need it not to install. I think about exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android what is ur opinion in it?

    – Moustaf EL-Saghier
    Mar 9 at 21:19












  • 1





    I suggest that an AlertDialog pops up before closing just to tell the user why the app is being closed

    – Sagar
    Mar 9 at 1:55











  • Wouldn't the first one also block tablets? Seems like a horrible idea blocking an entire platform over emulator concerns.

    – Zoe
    Mar 9 at 8:51











  • I need it not to install. I think about exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android what is ur opinion in it?

    – Moustaf EL-Saghier
    Mar 9 at 21:19







1




1





I suggest that an AlertDialog pops up before closing just to tell the user why the app is being closed

– Sagar
Mar 9 at 1:55





I suggest that an AlertDialog pops up before closing just to tell the user why the app is being closed

– Sagar
Mar 9 at 1:55













Wouldn't the first one also block tablets? Seems like a horrible idea blocking an entire platform over emulator concerns.

– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:51





Wouldn't the first one also block tablets? Seems like a horrible idea blocking an entire platform over emulator concerns.

– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:51













I need it not to install. I think about exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android what is ur opinion in it?

– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:19





I need it not to install. I think about exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android what is ur opinion in it?

– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:19



















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55072506%2fblock-my-android-app-from-install-on-bluestack-emulator%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can't initialize raids on a new ASUS Prime B360M-A motherboard2019 Community Moderator ElectionSimilar to RAID config yet more like mirroring solution?Can't get motherboard serial numberWhy does the BIOS entry point start with a WBINVD instruction?UEFI performance Asus Maximus V Extreme

Identity Server 4 is not redirecting to Angular app after login2019 Community Moderator ElectionIdentity Server 4 and dockerIdentityserver implicit flow unauthorized_clientIdentityServer Hybrid Flow - Access Token is null after user successful loginIdentity Server to MVC client : Page Redirect After loginLogin with Steam OpenId(oidc-client-js)Identity Server 4+.NET Core 2.0 + IdentityIdentityServer4 post-login redirect not working in Edge browserCall to IdentityServer4 generates System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an objectIdentityServer4 without HTTPS not workingHow to get Authorization code from identity server without login form

2005 Ahvaz unrest Contents Background Causes Casualties Aftermath See also References Navigation menue"At Least 10 Are Killed by Bombs in Iran""Iran"Archived"Arab-Iranians in Iran to make April 15 'Day of Fury'"State of Mind, State of Order: Reactions to Ethnic Unrest in the Islamic Republic of Iran.10.1111/j.1754-9469.2008.00028.x"Iran hangs Arab separatists"Iran Overview from ArchivedConstitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran"Tehran puzzled by forged 'riots' letter""Iran and its minorities: Down in the second class""Iran: Handling Of Ahvaz Unrest Could End With Televised Confessions""Bombings Rock Iran Ahead of Election""Five die in Iran ethnic clashes""Iran: Need for restraint as anniversary of unrest in Khuzestan approaches"Archived"Iranian Sunni protesters killed in clashes with security forces"Archived