block my android app from install on bluestack emulatorHow to restrict an APK not to get installed in Android Emulator/Simulator but in real device?Block emulators in android applicationFling gesture detection on grid layoutWhy is the Android emulator so slow? How can we speed up the Android emulator?Android emulator-5554 offlineHow do you install an APK file in the Android emulator?Android SDK installation doesn't find JDKHow do I rotate the Android emulator display?Android error: Failed to install *.apk on device *: timeoutRunning the new Intel emulator for AndroidCan't start Eclipse - Java was started but returned exit code=13Alternatives to android default emulator
Stopping power of mountain vs road bike
How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?
Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?
Combinations of multiple lists
Were any external disk drives stacked vertically?
How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?
How can I fix/modify my tub/shower combo so the water comes out of the showerhead?
Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?
In Romance of the Three Kingdoms why do people still use bamboo sticks when paper had already been invented?
Took a trip to a parallel universe, need help deciphering
Doing something right before you need it - expression for this?
What do you call someone who asks many questions?
Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?
Today is the Center
Is it possible to run Internet Explorer on OS X El Capitan?
What is the intuition behind short exact sequences of groups; in particular, what is the intuition behind group extensions?
What to put in ESTA if staying in US for a few days before going on to Canada
Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?
Alternative to sending password over mail?
90's TV series where a boy goes to another dimension through portal near power lines
What killed these X2 caps?
Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?
How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?
Reserved de-dupe rules
block my android app from install on bluestack emulator
How to restrict an APK not to get installed in Android Emulator/Simulator but in real device?Block emulators in android applicationFling gesture detection on grid layoutWhy is the Android emulator so slow? How can we speed up the Android emulator?Android emulator-5554 offlineHow do you install an APK file in the Android emulator?Android SDK installation doesn't find JDKHow do I rotate the Android emulator display?Android error: Failed to install *.apk on device *: timeoutRunning the new Intel emulator for AndroidCan't start Eclipse - Java was started but returned exit code=13Alternatives to android default emulator
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I'm new to create something like that
but I wanna to stop people install my app on emulators especially bluestack.
when I googled it I found this and this but both of them failed with me and it still installing on bluestack.
tried to use this lib too but failed
so I hope anyone help me solve this
android
add a comment |
I'm new to create something like that
but I wanna to stop people install my app on emulators especially bluestack.
when I googled it I found this and this but both of them failed with me and it still installing on bluestack.
tried to use this lib too but failed
so I hope anyone help me solve this
android
You can't technically block it from installing, and I highly recommend you don't spend time on this. Rooting the device (emulated or otherwise) offers a huge world of APK modifications, including removing emulator detection.
– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:53
but, what about Build architecture I mean exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android?
– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:18
add a comment |
I'm new to create something like that
but I wanna to stop people install my app on emulators especially bluestack.
when I googled it I found this and this but both of them failed with me and it still installing on bluestack.
tried to use this lib too but failed
so I hope anyone help me solve this
android
I'm new to create something like that
but I wanna to stop people install my app on emulators especially bluestack.
when I googled it I found this and this but both of them failed with me and it still installing on bluestack.
tried to use this lib too but failed
so I hope anyone help me solve this
android
android
edited Mar 9 at 8:52
Zoe
13.2k85386
13.2k85386
asked Mar 8 at 23:41
Moustaf EL-SaghierMoustaf EL-Saghier
14414
14414
You can't technically block it from installing, and I highly recommend you don't spend time on this. Rooting the device (emulated or otherwise) offers a huge world of APK modifications, including removing emulator detection.
– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:53
but, what about Build architecture I mean exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android?
– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:18
add a comment |
You can't technically block it from installing, and I highly recommend you don't spend time on this. Rooting the device (emulated or otherwise) offers a huge world of APK modifications, including removing emulator detection.
– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:53
but, what about Build architecture I mean exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android?
– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:18
You can't technically block it from installing, and I highly recommend you don't spend time on this. Rooting the device (emulated or otherwise) offers a huge world of APK modifications, including removing emulator detection.
– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:53
You can't technically block it from installing, and I highly recommend you don't spend time on this. Rooting the device (emulated or otherwise) offers a huge world of APK modifications, including removing emulator detection.
– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:53
but, what about Build architecture I mean exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android?
– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:18
but, what about Build architecture I mean exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android?
– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:18
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
here is my idea, first why not try to check for SIM number and deny it whoever has none,
on Java:
TelephonyManager telemamanger = (TelephonyManager) getSystemService(Context.TELEPHONY_SERVICE);
String getSimSerialNumber = telemamanger.getSimSerialNumber();
String getSimNumber = telemamanger.getLine1Number();
Enable permission in Manifest.xml
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE"/>
If that step fails because of User Modifications on their emulators try to check if the app is running on emulator,
public static boolean isEmulator()
If isEmulator() == true
then the app should be closed.
Hope this helps!
1
I suggest that anAlertDialog
pops up before closing just to tell the user why the app is being closed
– Sagar
Mar 9 at 1:55
Wouldn't the first one also block tablets? Seems like a horrible idea blocking an entire platform over emulator concerns.
– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:51
I need it not to install. I think about exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android what is ur opinion in it?
– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:19
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55072506%2fblock-my-android-app-from-install-on-bluestack-emulator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
here is my idea, first why not try to check for SIM number and deny it whoever has none,
on Java:
TelephonyManager telemamanger = (TelephonyManager) getSystemService(Context.TELEPHONY_SERVICE);
String getSimSerialNumber = telemamanger.getSimSerialNumber();
String getSimNumber = telemamanger.getLine1Number();
Enable permission in Manifest.xml
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE"/>
If that step fails because of User Modifications on their emulators try to check if the app is running on emulator,
public static boolean isEmulator()
If isEmulator() == true
then the app should be closed.
Hope this helps!
1
I suggest that anAlertDialog
pops up before closing just to tell the user why the app is being closed
– Sagar
Mar 9 at 1:55
Wouldn't the first one also block tablets? Seems like a horrible idea blocking an entire platform over emulator concerns.
– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:51
I need it not to install. I think about exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android what is ur opinion in it?
– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:19
add a comment |
here is my idea, first why not try to check for SIM number and deny it whoever has none,
on Java:
TelephonyManager telemamanger = (TelephonyManager) getSystemService(Context.TELEPHONY_SERVICE);
String getSimSerialNumber = telemamanger.getSimSerialNumber();
String getSimNumber = telemamanger.getLine1Number();
Enable permission in Manifest.xml
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE"/>
If that step fails because of User Modifications on their emulators try to check if the app is running on emulator,
public static boolean isEmulator()
If isEmulator() == true
then the app should be closed.
Hope this helps!
1
I suggest that anAlertDialog
pops up before closing just to tell the user why the app is being closed
– Sagar
Mar 9 at 1:55
Wouldn't the first one also block tablets? Seems like a horrible idea blocking an entire platform over emulator concerns.
– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:51
I need it not to install. I think about exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android what is ur opinion in it?
– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:19
add a comment |
here is my idea, first why not try to check for SIM number and deny it whoever has none,
on Java:
TelephonyManager telemamanger = (TelephonyManager) getSystemService(Context.TELEPHONY_SERVICE);
String getSimSerialNumber = telemamanger.getSimSerialNumber();
String getSimNumber = telemamanger.getLine1Number();
Enable permission in Manifest.xml
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE"/>
If that step fails because of User Modifications on their emulators try to check if the app is running on emulator,
public static boolean isEmulator()
If isEmulator() == true
then the app should be closed.
Hope this helps!
here is my idea, first why not try to check for SIM number and deny it whoever has none,
on Java:
TelephonyManager telemamanger = (TelephonyManager) getSystemService(Context.TELEPHONY_SERVICE);
String getSimSerialNumber = telemamanger.getSimSerialNumber();
String getSimNumber = telemamanger.getLine1Number();
Enable permission in Manifest.xml
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.READ_PHONE_STATE"/>
If that step fails because of User Modifications on their emulators try to check if the app is running on emulator,
public static boolean isEmulator()
If isEmulator() == true
then the app should be closed.
Hope this helps!
edited Mar 9 at 1:53
answered Mar 9 at 1:14
RoshanRoshan
659417
659417
1
I suggest that anAlertDialog
pops up before closing just to tell the user why the app is being closed
– Sagar
Mar 9 at 1:55
Wouldn't the first one also block tablets? Seems like a horrible idea blocking an entire platform over emulator concerns.
– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:51
I need it not to install. I think about exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android what is ur opinion in it?
– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:19
add a comment |
1
I suggest that anAlertDialog
pops up before closing just to tell the user why the app is being closed
– Sagar
Mar 9 at 1:55
Wouldn't the first one also block tablets? Seems like a horrible idea blocking an entire platform over emulator concerns.
– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:51
I need it not to install. I think about exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android what is ur opinion in it?
– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:19
1
1
I suggest that an
AlertDialog
pops up before closing just to tell the user why the app is being closed– Sagar
Mar 9 at 1:55
I suggest that an
AlertDialog
pops up before closing just to tell the user why the app is being closed– Sagar
Mar 9 at 1:55
Wouldn't the first one also block tablets? Seems like a horrible idea blocking an entire platform over emulator concerns.
– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:51
Wouldn't the first one also block tablets? Seems like a horrible idea blocking an entire platform over emulator concerns.
– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:51
I need it not to install. I think about exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android what is ur opinion in it?
– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:19
I need it not to install. I think about exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android what is ur opinion in it?
– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:19
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55072506%2fblock-my-android-app-from-install-on-bluestack-emulator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You can't technically block it from installing, and I highly recommend you don't spend time on this. Rooting the device (emulated or otherwise) offers a huge world of APK modifications, including removing emulator detection.
– Zoe
Mar 9 at 8:53
but, what about Build architecture I mean exclude x86 x86_64 from compiling in android?
– Moustaf EL-Saghier
Mar 9 at 21:18