Modelica Boolean variable in continuous time The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCalculate relative time in C#Which MySQL data type to use for storing boolean valuesHow to get the current time in PythonWhat do 'real', 'user' and 'sys' mean in the output of time(1)?Convert a Unix timestamp to time in JavaScriptUsing boolean values in CHow to declare and use boolean variables in shell script?Get current time and date on AndroidUsing coupled system of PDEs in modelicaNon-discrete assignments to integer variables

Is it a good idea to use COLUMN AS (left([Another_Column],(4)) instead of LEFT in the select?

Does it take more energy to get to Venus or to Mars?

Why doesn't a table tennis ball float on the surface? How do we calculate buoyancy here?

How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?

Inappropriate reference requests from Journal reviewers

Why is there a PLL in CPU?

Horror movie/show or scene where a horse creature opens its mouth really wide and devours a man in a stables

How can I open an app using Terminal?

Term for the "extreme-extension" version of a straw man fallacy?

Does the Brexit deal have to be agreed by both Houses?

Why here is plural "We went to the movies last night."

Whats the best way to handle refactoring a big file?

How to start emacs in "nothing" mode (`fundamental-mode`)

How do we know the LHC results are robust?

Why do professional authors make "consistency" mistakes? And how to avoid them?

Return the Closest Prime Number

Science fiction (dystopian) short story set after WWIII

If I blow insulation everywhere in my attic except the door trap, will heat escape through it?

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

How do I get the green key off the shelf in the Dobby level of Lego Harry Potter 2?

Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm

Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?

Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleagues

How to write papers efficiently when English isn't my first language?



Modelica Boolean variable in continuous time



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCalculate relative time in C#Which MySQL data type to use for storing boolean valuesHow to get the current time in PythonWhat do 'real', 'user' and 'sys' mean in the output of time(1)?Convert a Unix timestamp to time in JavaScriptUsing boolean values in CHow to declare and use boolean variables in shell script?Get current time and date on AndroidUsing coupled system of PDEs in modelicaNon-discrete assignments to integer variables










1















The following Modelica model checks and simulates.



model boolCheck_OK1
Real a = sin(time);
Real b = cos(time);
Real c;
//protected
// Boolean isInReg = inRegionCheck(a, b);
equation
c = if inRegionCheck(a, b) then 1.3*a^b else 0.7*b^a;
end boolCheck_OK1;


The function inRegionCheck() returns a Boolean, here is a simplified version:



function inRegionCheck
input Real a;
input Real b;
output Boolean c;
algorithm
c := a>b;
end inRegionCheck;


In the actual code, the function has more inputs and a longer name and is several lines long and the same check is used several times, so for readability I would like to introduce an intermediate variable as shown in the commented protected section, but that results in an error "Non-real equation in continuous time are not legal".



Any suggestions for an elegant workaround?










share|improve this question


























    1















    The following Modelica model checks and simulates.



    model boolCheck_OK1
    Real a = sin(time);
    Real b = cos(time);
    Real c;
    //protected
    // Boolean isInReg = inRegionCheck(a, b);
    equation
    c = if inRegionCheck(a, b) then 1.3*a^b else 0.7*b^a;
    end boolCheck_OK1;


    The function inRegionCheck() returns a Boolean, here is a simplified version:



    function inRegionCheck
    input Real a;
    input Real b;
    output Boolean c;
    algorithm
    c := a>b;
    end inRegionCheck;


    In the actual code, the function has more inputs and a longer name and is several lines long and the same check is used several times, so for readability I would like to introduce an intermediate variable as shown in the commented protected section, but that results in an error "Non-real equation in continuous time are not legal".



    Any suggestions for an elegant workaround?










    share|improve this question
























      1












      1








      1








      The following Modelica model checks and simulates.



      model boolCheck_OK1
      Real a = sin(time);
      Real b = cos(time);
      Real c;
      //protected
      // Boolean isInReg = inRegionCheck(a, b);
      equation
      c = if inRegionCheck(a, b) then 1.3*a^b else 0.7*b^a;
      end boolCheck_OK1;


      The function inRegionCheck() returns a Boolean, here is a simplified version:



      function inRegionCheck
      input Real a;
      input Real b;
      output Boolean c;
      algorithm
      c := a>b;
      end inRegionCheck;


      In the actual code, the function has more inputs and a longer name and is several lines long and the same check is used several times, so for readability I would like to introduce an intermediate variable as shown in the commented protected section, but that results in an error "Non-real equation in continuous time are not legal".



      Any suggestions for an elegant workaround?










      share|improve this question














      The following Modelica model checks and simulates.



      model boolCheck_OK1
      Real a = sin(time);
      Real b = cos(time);
      Real c;
      //protected
      // Boolean isInReg = inRegionCheck(a, b);
      equation
      c = if inRegionCheck(a, b) then 1.3*a^b else 0.7*b^a;
      end boolCheck_OK1;


      The function inRegionCheck() returns a Boolean, here is a simplified version:



      function inRegionCheck
      input Real a;
      input Real b;
      output Boolean c;
      algorithm
      c := a>b;
      end inRegionCheck;


      In the actual code, the function has more inputs and a longer name and is several lines long and the same check is used several times, so for readability I would like to introduce an intermediate variable as shown in the commented protected section, but that results in an error "Non-real equation in continuous time are not legal".



      Any suggestions for an elegant workaround?







      time boolean modelica continuous






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 8 at 12:49









      matthmatth

      1,26311234




      1,26311234






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          Works in SimulationX (with protected Boolean variable isInReg) if the function inRegionCheck is annotated by annotation(GenerateEvents=true);. In Dymola, you need to set annotation(Inline=true,GenerateEvents=true); to make it working.






          share|improve this answer























          • Nice. Didn't know about the GenerateEvents annotation. The Modelica Reference package does not contain it. But it links to trac.modelica.org/Modelica/ticket/1048 and says that it was removed in Modelica 3.2 rev2!?

            – marco
            Mar 12 at 6:39







          • 2





            Note that Modelica 3.2r2 was released after Modelica 3.3. GenerateEvents was first introduced in Modelica 3.3. When backporting features of Modelica 3.3 to Modelica 3.2r2 it was first considered, but later removed again. This is what github.com/modelica/ModelicaSpecification/issues/1048 is about. And since the ModelicaReference is based on Modelica 3.2r2 it is not yet there.

            – tbeu
            Mar 12 at 6:57



















          1














          The function call introduces a noEvent in your equation for isInReg.



          This is what Dymola 2019 FD01 reports if the boolean is used:



          Non-real equation in continuous time are not legal:
          isInReg = noEvent(a > b);


          Hence, your equation reduces to



          isInReg = noEvent(a > b)


          which is not allowed, as boolean values can only change on events.
          You have to get rid of the function call and thus the noEvent.



          Maybe there is a better solution, but you could try to define the check in a block instead of a function. At least for your minimal example it works perfectly fine.



          Then your code could look like this:



          model boolCheck_OK1
          Real a = sin(time);
          Real b = cos(time);
          Real c;
          protected
          InRegionCheck check(a=a, b=b);
          Boolean isInReg=check.c;
          equation
          c = if isInReg then 1.3*a^b else 0.7*b^a;
          end boolCheck_OK1;

          block InRegionCheck
          input Real a;
          input Real b;
          output Boolean c;
          equation
          c = a>b;
          end InRegionCheck;





          share|improve this answer
































            1














            Based on the fact that there is no function to convert to boolean but only a block, i would suggest marco's answer is the way to go.



            With a workaround you can still do it inside a function, but not with the type Boolean. Instead use Real and compare in the if-clause if it's greater zero. For showing the switching behaviour of the boolean this works fine. If you rely on the function and don't use the boolean too often, this could be an option.



            model boolCheck_OK1
            Real a = sin(time);
            Real b = cos(time);
            Real c;

            function inRegionCheck
            input Real a;
            input Real b;
            output Real c;
            algorithm
            c := if a>b then 1 else 0;
            end inRegionCheck;
            protected
            Real isInReg = inRegionCheck(a, b);

            equation
            c = if inRegionCheck(a, b)>Modelica.Constants.eps then 1.3*a^b else 0.7*b^a;
            end boolCheck_OK1;





            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer






              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
              StackExchange.snippets.init();
              );
              );
              , "code-snippets");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "1"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55063596%2fmodelica-boolean-variable-in-continuous-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3














              Works in SimulationX (with protected Boolean variable isInReg) if the function inRegionCheck is annotated by annotation(GenerateEvents=true);. In Dymola, you need to set annotation(Inline=true,GenerateEvents=true); to make it working.






              share|improve this answer























              • Nice. Didn't know about the GenerateEvents annotation. The Modelica Reference package does not contain it. But it links to trac.modelica.org/Modelica/ticket/1048 and says that it was removed in Modelica 3.2 rev2!?

                – marco
                Mar 12 at 6:39







              • 2





                Note that Modelica 3.2r2 was released after Modelica 3.3. GenerateEvents was first introduced in Modelica 3.3. When backporting features of Modelica 3.3 to Modelica 3.2r2 it was first considered, but later removed again. This is what github.com/modelica/ModelicaSpecification/issues/1048 is about. And since the ModelicaReference is based on Modelica 3.2r2 it is not yet there.

                – tbeu
                Mar 12 at 6:57
















              3














              Works in SimulationX (with protected Boolean variable isInReg) if the function inRegionCheck is annotated by annotation(GenerateEvents=true);. In Dymola, you need to set annotation(Inline=true,GenerateEvents=true); to make it working.






              share|improve this answer























              • Nice. Didn't know about the GenerateEvents annotation. The Modelica Reference package does not contain it. But it links to trac.modelica.org/Modelica/ticket/1048 and says that it was removed in Modelica 3.2 rev2!?

                – marco
                Mar 12 at 6:39







              • 2





                Note that Modelica 3.2r2 was released after Modelica 3.3. GenerateEvents was first introduced in Modelica 3.3. When backporting features of Modelica 3.3 to Modelica 3.2r2 it was first considered, but later removed again. This is what github.com/modelica/ModelicaSpecification/issues/1048 is about. And since the ModelicaReference is based on Modelica 3.2r2 it is not yet there.

                – tbeu
                Mar 12 at 6:57














              3












              3








              3







              Works in SimulationX (with protected Boolean variable isInReg) if the function inRegionCheck is annotated by annotation(GenerateEvents=true);. In Dymola, you need to set annotation(Inline=true,GenerateEvents=true); to make it working.






              share|improve this answer













              Works in SimulationX (with protected Boolean variable isInReg) if the function inRegionCheck is annotated by annotation(GenerateEvents=true);. In Dymola, you need to set annotation(Inline=true,GenerateEvents=true); to make it working.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Mar 11 at 10:58









              tbeutbeu

              42526




              42526












              • Nice. Didn't know about the GenerateEvents annotation. The Modelica Reference package does not contain it. But it links to trac.modelica.org/Modelica/ticket/1048 and says that it was removed in Modelica 3.2 rev2!?

                – marco
                Mar 12 at 6:39







              • 2





                Note that Modelica 3.2r2 was released after Modelica 3.3. GenerateEvents was first introduced in Modelica 3.3. When backporting features of Modelica 3.3 to Modelica 3.2r2 it was first considered, but later removed again. This is what github.com/modelica/ModelicaSpecification/issues/1048 is about. And since the ModelicaReference is based on Modelica 3.2r2 it is not yet there.

                – tbeu
                Mar 12 at 6:57


















              • Nice. Didn't know about the GenerateEvents annotation. The Modelica Reference package does not contain it. But it links to trac.modelica.org/Modelica/ticket/1048 and says that it was removed in Modelica 3.2 rev2!?

                – marco
                Mar 12 at 6:39







              • 2





                Note that Modelica 3.2r2 was released after Modelica 3.3. GenerateEvents was first introduced in Modelica 3.3. When backporting features of Modelica 3.3 to Modelica 3.2r2 it was first considered, but later removed again. This is what github.com/modelica/ModelicaSpecification/issues/1048 is about. And since the ModelicaReference is based on Modelica 3.2r2 it is not yet there.

                – tbeu
                Mar 12 at 6:57

















              Nice. Didn't know about the GenerateEvents annotation. The Modelica Reference package does not contain it. But it links to trac.modelica.org/Modelica/ticket/1048 and says that it was removed in Modelica 3.2 rev2!?

              – marco
              Mar 12 at 6:39






              Nice. Didn't know about the GenerateEvents annotation. The Modelica Reference package does not contain it. But it links to trac.modelica.org/Modelica/ticket/1048 and says that it was removed in Modelica 3.2 rev2!?

              – marco
              Mar 12 at 6:39





              2




              2





              Note that Modelica 3.2r2 was released after Modelica 3.3. GenerateEvents was first introduced in Modelica 3.3. When backporting features of Modelica 3.3 to Modelica 3.2r2 it was first considered, but later removed again. This is what github.com/modelica/ModelicaSpecification/issues/1048 is about. And since the ModelicaReference is based on Modelica 3.2r2 it is not yet there.

              – tbeu
              Mar 12 at 6:57






              Note that Modelica 3.2r2 was released after Modelica 3.3. GenerateEvents was first introduced in Modelica 3.3. When backporting features of Modelica 3.3 to Modelica 3.2r2 it was first considered, but later removed again. This is what github.com/modelica/ModelicaSpecification/issues/1048 is about. And since the ModelicaReference is based on Modelica 3.2r2 it is not yet there.

              – tbeu
              Mar 12 at 6:57














              1














              The function call introduces a noEvent in your equation for isInReg.



              This is what Dymola 2019 FD01 reports if the boolean is used:



              Non-real equation in continuous time are not legal:
              isInReg = noEvent(a > b);


              Hence, your equation reduces to



              isInReg = noEvent(a > b)


              which is not allowed, as boolean values can only change on events.
              You have to get rid of the function call and thus the noEvent.



              Maybe there is a better solution, but you could try to define the check in a block instead of a function. At least for your minimal example it works perfectly fine.



              Then your code could look like this:



              model boolCheck_OK1
              Real a = sin(time);
              Real b = cos(time);
              Real c;
              protected
              InRegionCheck check(a=a, b=b);
              Boolean isInReg=check.c;
              equation
              c = if isInReg then 1.3*a^b else 0.7*b^a;
              end boolCheck_OK1;

              block InRegionCheck
              input Real a;
              input Real b;
              output Boolean c;
              equation
              c = a>b;
              end InRegionCheck;





              share|improve this answer





























                1














                The function call introduces a noEvent in your equation for isInReg.



                This is what Dymola 2019 FD01 reports if the boolean is used:



                Non-real equation in continuous time are not legal:
                isInReg = noEvent(a > b);


                Hence, your equation reduces to



                isInReg = noEvent(a > b)


                which is not allowed, as boolean values can only change on events.
                You have to get rid of the function call and thus the noEvent.



                Maybe there is a better solution, but you could try to define the check in a block instead of a function. At least for your minimal example it works perfectly fine.



                Then your code could look like this:



                model boolCheck_OK1
                Real a = sin(time);
                Real b = cos(time);
                Real c;
                protected
                InRegionCheck check(a=a, b=b);
                Boolean isInReg=check.c;
                equation
                c = if isInReg then 1.3*a^b else 0.7*b^a;
                end boolCheck_OK1;

                block InRegionCheck
                input Real a;
                input Real b;
                output Boolean c;
                equation
                c = a>b;
                end InRegionCheck;





                share|improve this answer



























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  The function call introduces a noEvent in your equation for isInReg.



                  This is what Dymola 2019 FD01 reports if the boolean is used:



                  Non-real equation in continuous time are not legal:
                  isInReg = noEvent(a > b);


                  Hence, your equation reduces to



                  isInReg = noEvent(a > b)


                  which is not allowed, as boolean values can only change on events.
                  You have to get rid of the function call and thus the noEvent.



                  Maybe there is a better solution, but you could try to define the check in a block instead of a function. At least for your minimal example it works perfectly fine.



                  Then your code could look like this:



                  model boolCheck_OK1
                  Real a = sin(time);
                  Real b = cos(time);
                  Real c;
                  protected
                  InRegionCheck check(a=a, b=b);
                  Boolean isInReg=check.c;
                  equation
                  c = if isInReg then 1.3*a^b else 0.7*b^a;
                  end boolCheck_OK1;

                  block InRegionCheck
                  input Real a;
                  input Real b;
                  output Boolean c;
                  equation
                  c = a>b;
                  end InRegionCheck;





                  share|improve this answer















                  The function call introduces a noEvent in your equation for isInReg.



                  This is what Dymola 2019 FD01 reports if the boolean is used:



                  Non-real equation in continuous time are not legal:
                  isInReg = noEvent(a > b);


                  Hence, your equation reduces to



                  isInReg = noEvent(a > b)


                  which is not allowed, as boolean values can only change on events.
                  You have to get rid of the function call and thus the noEvent.



                  Maybe there is a better solution, but you could try to define the check in a block instead of a function. At least for your minimal example it works perfectly fine.



                  Then your code could look like this:



                  model boolCheck_OK1
                  Real a = sin(time);
                  Real b = cos(time);
                  Real c;
                  protected
                  InRegionCheck check(a=a, b=b);
                  Boolean isInReg=check.c;
                  equation
                  c = if isInReg then 1.3*a^b else 0.7*b^a;
                  end boolCheck_OK1;

                  block InRegionCheck
                  input Real a;
                  input Real b;
                  output Boolean c;
                  equation
                  c = a>b;
                  end InRegionCheck;






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Mar 8 at 13:58

























                  answered Mar 8 at 13:31









                  marcomarco

                  922211




                  922211





















                      1














                      Based on the fact that there is no function to convert to boolean but only a block, i would suggest marco's answer is the way to go.



                      With a workaround you can still do it inside a function, but not with the type Boolean. Instead use Real and compare in the if-clause if it's greater zero. For showing the switching behaviour of the boolean this works fine. If you rely on the function and don't use the boolean too often, this could be an option.



                      model boolCheck_OK1
                      Real a = sin(time);
                      Real b = cos(time);
                      Real c;

                      function inRegionCheck
                      input Real a;
                      input Real b;
                      output Real c;
                      algorithm
                      c := if a>b then 1 else 0;
                      end inRegionCheck;
                      protected
                      Real isInReg = inRegionCheck(a, b);

                      equation
                      c = if inRegionCheck(a, b)>Modelica.Constants.eps then 1.3*a^b else 0.7*b^a;
                      end boolCheck_OK1;





                      share|improve this answer



























                        1














                        Based on the fact that there is no function to convert to boolean but only a block, i would suggest marco's answer is the way to go.



                        With a workaround you can still do it inside a function, but not with the type Boolean. Instead use Real and compare in the if-clause if it's greater zero. For showing the switching behaviour of the boolean this works fine. If you rely on the function and don't use the boolean too often, this could be an option.



                        model boolCheck_OK1
                        Real a = sin(time);
                        Real b = cos(time);
                        Real c;

                        function inRegionCheck
                        input Real a;
                        input Real b;
                        output Real c;
                        algorithm
                        c := if a>b then 1 else 0;
                        end inRegionCheck;
                        protected
                        Real isInReg = inRegionCheck(a, b);

                        equation
                        c = if inRegionCheck(a, b)>Modelica.Constants.eps then 1.3*a^b else 0.7*b^a;
                        end boolCheck_OK1;





                        share|improve this answer

























                          1












                          1








                          1







                          Based on the fact that there is no function to convert to boolean but only a block, i would suggest marco's answer is the way to go.



                          With a workaround you can still do it inside a function, but not with the type Boolean. Instead use Real and compare in the if-clause if it's greater zero. For showing the switching behaviour of the boolean this works fine. If you rely on the function and don't use the boolean too often, this could be an option.



                          model boolCheck_OK1
                          Real a = sin(time);
                          Real b = cos(time);
                          Real c;

                          function inRegionCheck
                          input Real a;
                          input Real b;
                          output Real c;
                          algorithm
                          c := if a>b then 1 else 0;
                          end inRegionCheck;
                          protected
                          Real isInReg = inRegionCheck(a, b);

                          equation
                          c = if inRegionCheck(a, b)>Modelica.Constants.eps then 1.3*a^b else 0.7*b^a;
                          end boolCheck_OK1;





                          share|improve this answer













                          Based on the fact that there is no function to convert to boolean but only a block, i would suggest marco's answer is the way to go.



                          With a workaround you can still do it inside a function, but not with the type Boolean. Instead use Real and compare in the if-clause if it's greater zero. For showing the switching behaviour of the boolean this works fine. If you rely on the function and don't use the boolean too often, this could be an option.



                          model boolCheck_OK1
                          Real a = sin(time);
                          Real b = cos(time);
                          Real c;

                          function inRegionCheck
                          input Real a;
                          input Real b;
                          output Real c;
                          algorithm
                          c := if a>b then 1 else 0;
                          end inRegionCheck;
                          protected
                          Real isInReg = inRegionCheck(a, b);

                          equation
                          c = if inRegionCheck(a, b)>Modelica.Constants.eps then 1.3*a^b else 0.7*b^a;
                          end boolCheck_OK1;






                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Mar 11 at 8:55









                          f.wuef.wue

                          543413




                          543413



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55063596%2fmodelica-boolean-variable-in-continuous-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Can't initialize raids on a new ASUS Prime B360M-A motherboard2019 Community Moderator ElectionSimilar to RAID config yet more like mirroring solution?Can't get motherboard serial numberWhy does the BIOS entry point start with a WBINVD instruction?UEFI performance Asus Maximus V Extreme

                              Identity Server 4 is not redirecting to Angular app after login2019 Community Moderator ElectionIdentity Server 4 and dockerIdentityserver implicit flow unauthorized_clientIdentityServer Hybrid Flow - Access Token is null after user successful loginIdentity Server to MVC client : Page Redirect After loginLogin with Steam OpenId(oidc-client-js)Identity Server 4+.NET Core 2.0 + IdentityIdentityServer4 post-login redirect not working in Edge browserCall to IdentityServer4 generates System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an objectIdentityServer4 without HTTPS not workingHow to get Authorization code from identity server without login form

                              2005 Ahvaz unrest Contents Background Causes Casualties Aftermath See also References Navigation menue"At Least 10 Are Killed by Bombs in Iran""Iran"Archived"Arab-Iranians in Iran to make April 15 'Day of Fury'"State of Mind, State of Order: Reactions to Ethnic Unrest in the Islamic Republic of Iran.10.1111/j.1754-9469.2008.00028.x"Iran hangs Arab separatists"Iran Overview from ArchivedConstitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran"Tehran puzzled by forged 'riots' letter""Iran and its minorities: Down in the second class""Iran: Handling Of Ahvaz Unrest Could End With Televised Confessions""Bombings Rock Iran Ahead of Election""Five die in Iran ethnic clashes""Iran: Need for restraint as anniversary of unrest in Khuzestan approaches"Archived"Iranian Sunni protesters killed in clashes with security forces"Archived