How to fix this haskell function using take and drop while?How to reduce memory usage in a Haskell app?How can a time function exist in functional programming?Reasonably efficient pure-functional matrix product in Haskell?Infinite list of powers using subset of HaskellHaskell/Parsec: How do you use the functions in Text.Parsec.Indent?Little problems from a Haskell learner about filter & foldHaskell checkers - how to write a function that returns a list of possible jumpshaskell initial accumulator 'null' valueHow does the presence of the “error” function bear on the purity of Haskell?How to create function minimax in Haskell?

Minkowski space

Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?

tikz: show 0 at the axis origin

Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?

How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?

TGV timetables / schedules?

Is a tag line useful on a cover?

Theorems that impeded progress

Why do falling prices hurt debtors?

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Mathematical cryptic clues

What does "Puller Prush Person" mean?

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?

Do VLANs within a subnet need to have their own subnet for router on a stick?

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

Modeling an IPv4 Address

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

How to find program name(s) of an installed package?

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

Why not use SQL instead of GraphQL?

Has the BBC provided arguments for saying Brexit being cancelled is unlikely?

Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free

Fencing style for blades that can attack from a distance

How to write a macro that is braces sensitive?



How to fix this haskell function using take and drop while?


How to reduce memory usage in a Haskell app?How can a time function exist in functional programming?Reasonably efficient pure-functional matrix product in Haskell?Infinite list of powers using subset of HaskellHaskell/Parsec: How do you use the functions in Text.Parsec.Indent?Little problems from a Haskell learner about filter & foldHaskell checkers - how to write a function that returns a list of possible jumpshaskell initial accumulator 'null' valueHow does the presence of the “error” function bear on the purity of Haskell?How to create function minimax in Haskell?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








1















I am asked to create a haskell function that will perform the following:



group [1,1,2,3,3] = [[1,1],[2],[3,3]]

group [] = []


Essentially it groups the consecutive terms that are the same



I should use take and drop while:



group [] = []
group (x:xs) = (takeWhile cond xs ++ [x]) : group (dropWhile cond xs)
where
cond = (x -> x == head xs)


Here is what I have.



The above works for cases where a single element is at the end: group [1,1,2] == [[1,1],2] but not for cases where it's in the middle: group [1,1,1,2,4] == [[1,1,1],[4,2]] (it should be [[1,1,1],[4],[2]]



What is my mistake in the function?










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Two different variables are named x.

    – Jason Orendorff
    Mar 9 at 3:38






  • 2





    group [1,1,2] == [[1,1],2] I know that can't be true without even looking at the source of group, because the RHS is ill-typed.

    – Joseph Sible
    Mar 9 at 4:27

















1















I am asked to create a haskell function that will perform the following:



group [1,1,2,3,3] = [[1,1],[2],[3,3]]

group [] = []


Essentially it groups the consecutive terms that are the same



I should use take and drop while:



group [] = []
group (x:xs) = (takeWhile cond xs ++ [x]) : group (dropWhile cond xs)
where
cond = (x -> x == head xs)


Here is what I have.



The above works for cases where a single element is at the end: group [1,1,2] == [[1,1],2] but not for cases where it's in the middle: group [1,1,1,2,4] == [[1,1,1],[4,2]] (it should be [[1,1,1],[4],[2]]



What is my mistake in the function?










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Two different variables are named x.

    – Jason Orendorff
    Mar 9 at 3:38






  • 2





    group [1,1,2] == [[1,1],2] I know that can't be true without even looking at the source of group, because the RHS is ill-typed.

    – Joseph Sible
    Mar 9 at 4:27













1












1








1








I am asked to create a haskell function that will perform the following:



group [1,1,2,3,3] = [[1,1],[2],[3,3]]

group [] = []


Essentially it groups the consecutive terms that are the same



I should use take and drop while:



group [] = []
group (x:xs) = (takeWhile cond xs ++ [x]) : group (dropWhile cond xs)
where
cond = (x -> x == head xs)


Here is what I have.



The above works for cases where a single element is at the end: group [1,1,2] == [[1,1],2] but not for cases where it's in the middle: group [1,1,1,2,4] == [[1,1,1],[4,2]] (it should be [[1,1,1],[4],[2]]



What is my mistake in the function?










share|improve this question














I am asked to create a haskell function that will perform the following:



group [1,1,2,3,3] = [[1,1],[2],[3,3]]

group [] = []


Essentially it groups the consecutive terms that are the same



I should use take and drop while:



group [] = []
group (x:xs) = (takeWhile cond xs ++ [x]) : group (dropWhile cond xs)
where
cond = (x -> x == head xs)


Here is what I have.



The above works for cases where a single element is at the end: group [1,1,2] == [[1,1],2] but not for cases where it's in the middle: group [1,1,1,2,4] == [[1,1,1],[4,2]] (it should be [[1,1,1],[4],[2]]



What is my mistake in the function?







haskell






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 9 at 2:17









K Split XK Split X

9603619




9603619







  • 1





    Two different variables are named x.

    – Jason Orendorff
    Mar 9 at 3:38






  • 2





    group [1,1,2] == [[1,1],2] I know that can't be true without even looking at the source of group, because the RHS is ill-typed.

    – Joseph Sible
    Mar 9 at 4:27












  • 1





    Two different variables are named x.

    – Jason Orendorff
    Mar 9 at 3:38






  • 2





    group [1,1,2] == [[1,1],2] I know that can't be true without even looking at the source of group, because the RHS is ill-typed.

    – Joseph Sible
    Mar 9 at 4:27







1




1





Two different variables are named x.

– Jason Orendorff
Mar 9 at 3:38





Two different variables are named x.

– Jason Orendorff
Mar 9 at 3:38




2




2





group [1,1,2] == [[1,1],2] I know that can't be true without even looking at the source of group, because the RHS is ill-typed.

– Joseph Sible
Mar 9 at 4:27





group [1,1,2] == [[1,1],2] I know that can't be true without even looking at the source of group, because the RHS is ill-typed.

– Joseph Sible
Mar 9 at 4:27












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














Short answer: Your mistake is the usage of head in your condition. You want to compare with x, not head xs.



Stylistically, note also that




  1. something ++ [x] is less practical (and "efficient", although it doesn't really matter here) as x : something here, as order doesn't matter,

  2. a function as f = x -> something should really be written as f x = something,

  3. and you probably shouldn't use the same variable name to refer to different values, it's get confusing very easily.

Your function cond is easily rewritten using a partially applied ==:



group [] = []
group (x:xs) = (x : takeWhile cond xs) : group (dropWhile cond xs)
where cond = (==) x


This yields the expected result for group [1,1,1,2,4].






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Did you mean to say "less practical" instead of "more practical"?

    – Fyodor Soikin
    Mar 9 at 3:43











  • @FyodorSoikin Yes, thank you. Edited my post.

    – tolUene
    Mar 9 at 3:46











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55073376%2fhow-to-fix-this-haskell-function-using-take-and-drop-while%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














Short answer: Your mistake is the usage of head in your condition. You want to compare with x, not head xs.



Stylistically, note also that




  1. something ++ [x] is less practical (and "efficient", although it doesn't really matter here) as x : something here, as order doesn't matter,

  2. a function as f = x -> something should really be written as f x = something,

  3. and you probably shouldn't use the same variable name to refer to different values, it's get confusing very easily.

Your function cond is easily rewritten using a partially applied ==:



group [] = []
group (x:xs) = (x : takeWhile cond xs) : group (dropWhile cond xs)
where cond = (==) x


This yields the expected result for group [1,1,1,2,4].






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Did you mean to say "less practical" instead of "more practical"?

    – Fyodor Soikin
    Mar 9 at 3:43











  • @FyodorSoikin Yes, thank you. Edited my post.

    – tolUene
    Mar 9 at 3:46















5














Short answer: Your mistake is the usage of head in your condition. You want to compare with x, not head xs.



Stylistically, note also that




  1. something ++ [x] is less practical (and "efficient", although it doesn't really matter here) as x : something here, as order doesn't matter,

  2. a function as f = x -> something should really be written as f x = something,

  3. and you probably shouldn't use the same variable name to refer to different values, it's get confusing very easily.

Your function cond is easily rewritten using a partially applied ==:



group [] = []
group (x:xs) = (x : takeWhile cond xs) : group (dropWhile cond xs)
where cond = (==) x


This yields the expected result for group [1,1,1,2,4].






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Did you mean to say "less practical" instead of "more practical"?

    – Fyodor Soikin
    Mar 9 at 3:43











  • @FyodorSoikin Yes, thank you. Edited my post.

    – tolUene
    Mar 9 at 3:46













5












5








5







Short answer: Your mistake is the usage of head in your condition. You want to compare with x, not head xs.



Stylistically, note also that




  1. something ++ [x] is less practical (and "efficient", although it doesn't really matter here) as x : something here, as order doesn't matter,

  2. a function as f = x -> something should really be written as f x = something,

  3. and you probably shouldn't use the same variable name to refer to different values, it's get confusing very easily.

Your function cond is easily rewritten using a partially applied ==:



group [] = []
group (x:xs) = (x : takeWhile cond xs) : group (dropWhile cond xs)
where cond = (==) x


This yields the expected result for group [1,1,1,2,4].






share|improve this answer















Short answer: Your mistake is the usage of head in your condition. You want to compare with x, not head xs.



Stylistically, note also that




  1. something ++ [x] is less practical (and "efficient", although it doesn't really matter here) as x : something here, as order doesn't matter,

  2. a function as f = x -> something should really be written as f x = something,

  3. and you probably shouldn't use the same variable name to refer to different values, it's get confusing very easily.

Your function cond is easily rewritten using a partially applied ==:



group [] = []
group (x:xs) = (x : takeWhile cond xs) : group (dropWhile cond xs)
where cond = (==) x


This yields the expected result for group [1,1,1,2,4].







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 9 at 3:45

























answered Mar 9 at 3:31









tolUenetolUene

323114




323114







  • 1





    Did you mean to say "less practical" instead of "more practical"?

    – Fyodor Soikin
    Mar 9 at 3:43











  • @FyodorSoikin Yes, thank you. Edited my post.

    – tolUene
    Mar 9 at 3:46












  • 1





    Did you mean to say "less practical" instead of "more practical"?

    – Fyodor Soikin
    Mar 9 at 3:43











  • @FyodorSoikin Yes, thank you. Edited my post.

    – tolUene
    Mar 9 at 3:46







1




1





Did you mean to say "less practical" instead of "more practical"?

– Fyodor Soikin
Mar 9 at 3:43





Did you mean to say "less practical" instead of "more practical"?

– Fyodor Soikin
Mar 9 at 3:43













@FyodorSoikin Yes, thank you. Edited my post.

– tolUene
Mar 9 at 3:46





@FyodorSoikin Yes, thank you. Edited my post.

– tolUene
Mar 9 at 3:46



















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55073376%2fhow-to-fix-this-haskell-function-using-take-and-drop-while%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

How to get text form Clipboard with JavaScript in Firefox 56?How to validate an email address in JavaScript?How do JavaScript closures work?How do I remove a property from a JavaScript object?How do you get a timestamp in JavaScript?How do I copy to the clipboard in JavaScript?How do I include a JavaScript file in another JavaScript file?Get the current URL with JavaScript?How to replace all occurrences of a string in JavaScriptHow to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?How do I remove a particular element from an array in JavaScript?

Can't initialize raids on a new ASUS Prime B360M-A motherboard2019 Community Moderator ElectionSimilar to RAID config yet more like mirroring solution?Can't get motherboard serial numberWhy does the BIOS entry point start with a WBINVD instruction?UEFI performance Asus Maximus V Extreme

List of MPs elected to the English parliament in 1640 (April) Contents List of constituencies and members See also Notes References Navigation menueNational Archives – The Glynde Place ArchivesCobbett's Parliamentary history of England, from the Norman Conquest in 1066 to the year 1803'Aldermen in Parliament', The Aldermen of the City of London: Temp. Henry III – 1912onepage&q&f&#61, false 229