Firestore Rule: Only strings in ListFirestore Security Rules how to validate deeply nested array/map valuesFirestore security rules for `list` requestFirebase Firestore RulesHow to check if there is only one specific field who is updated with Firestore rules?Cloud Firestore Security Rules allow write only from Firebase functionFirestore Security Rules RegexFirestore security rules - Unique usernamesNested Firestore security rules - get()Firestore Rule allowing overwriteFirestore rules - Allow only update certain field of a documentSecurity rules Firestore
What mechanic is there to disable a threat instead of killing it?
Should I cover my bicycle overnight while bikepacking?
How can I determine if the org that I'm currently connected to is a scratch org?
Examples of smooth manifolds admitting inbetween one and a continuum of complex structures
In 'Revenger,' what does 'cove' come from?
What killed these X2 caps?
Venezuelan girlfriend wants to travel the USA to be with me. What is the process?
Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?
Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?
Watching something be piped to a file live with tail
Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?
Can we compute the area of a quadrilateral with one right angle when we only know the lengths of any three sides?
Do UK voters know if their MP will be the Speaker of the House?
How can I deal with my CEO asking me to hire someone with a higher salary than me, a co-founder?
Intersection Puzzle
Im going to France and my passport expires June 19th
Detention in 1997
Assassin's bullet with mercury
How would I stat a creature to be immune to everything but the Magic Missile spell? (just for fun)
Unlock My Phone! February 2018
How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?
Why didn't Boeing produce its own regional jet?
Ambiguity in the definition of entropy
How dangerous is XSS?
Firestore Rule: Only strings in List
Firestore Security Rules how to validate deeply nested array/map valuesFirestore security rules for `list` requestFirebase Firestore RulesHow to check if there is only one specific field who is updated with Firestore rules?Cloud Firestore Security Rules allow write only from Firebase functionFirestore Security Rules RegexFirestore security rules - Unique usernamesNested Firestore security rules - get()Firestore Rule allowing overwriteFirestore rules - Allow only update certain field of a documentSecurity rules Firestore
How can I check if there are only strings in request.resource.data.myArray?
Loops and recursive calls are not allowed.
google-cloud-firestore firebase-security-rules
edited Mar 9 at 1:37
Frank van Puffelen
245k29389416
asked Mar 8 at 22:29
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
6771728
add a comment |
How can I check if there are only strings in request.resource.data.myArray?
Loops and recursive calls are not allowed.
google-cloud-firestore firebase-security-rules
edited Mar 9 at 1:37
Frank van Puffelen
245k29389416
asked Mar 8 at 22:29
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
6771728
add a comment |
How can I check if there are only strings in request.resource.data.myArray?
Loops and recursive calls are not allowed.
google-cloud-firestore firebase-security-rules
edited Mar 9 at 1:37
Frank van Puffelen
245k29389416
asked Mar 8 at 22:29
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
6771728
How can I check if there are only strings in request.resource.data.myArray?
Loops and recursive calls are not allowed.
google-cloud-firestore firebase-security-rules
google-cloud-firestore firebase-security-rules
edited Mar 9 at 1:37
Frank van Puffelen
245k29389416
asked Mar 8 at 22:29
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
6771728
edited Mar 9 at 1:37
Frank van Puffelen
245k29389416
asked Mar 8 at 22:29
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
6771728
edited Mar 9 at 1:37
Frank van Puffelen
245k29389416
edited Mar 9 at 1:37
Frank van Puffelen
245k29389416
edited Mar 9 at 1:37
Frank van Puffelen
245k29389416
245k29389416
asked Mar 8 at 22:29
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
6771728
asked Mar 8 at 22:29
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
6771728
asked Mar 8 at 22:29
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
6771728
6771728
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This is not possible today, unless you know the size of the array, and you write an expression to check the element at each index. However, what you're asking is a reasonable thing to want to do, and you should file a feature request for it. Bear in mind, though, that it's a long way off from happening.
The only way this would eventually work is if the rules language had a lambda type where you could pass a predicate function into a method that ensures it only returns true for every element in the list. But that concept doesn't exist right now, so it would require a fair amount of effort to implement.
answered Mar 8 at 23:51
Doug StevensonDoug Stevenson
83.3k10100118
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55071893%2ffirestore-rule-only-strings-in-list%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is not possible today, unless you know the size of the array, and you write an expression to check the element at each index. However, what you're asking is a reasonable thing to want to do, and you should file a feature request for it. Bear in mind, though, that it's a long way off from happening.
The only way this would eventually work is if the rules language had a lambda type where you could pass a predicate function into a method that ensures it only returns true for every element in the list. But that concept doesn't exist right now, so it would require a fair amount of effort to implement.
answered Mar 8 at 23:51
Doug StevensonDoug Stevenson
83.3k10100118
add a comment |
This is not possible today, unless you know the size of the array, and you write an expression to check the element at each index. However, what you're asking is a reasonable thing to want to do, and you should file a feature request for it. Bear in mind, though, that it's a long way off from happening.
The only way this would eventually work is if the rules language had a lambda type where you could pass a predicate function into a method that ensures it only returns true for every element in the list. But that concept doesn't exist right now, so it would require a fair amount of effort to implement.
answered Mar 8 at 23:51
Doug StevensonDoug Stevenson
83.3k10100118
add a comment |
This is not possible today, unless you know the size of the array, and you write an expression to check the element at each index. However, what you're asking is a reasonable thing to want to do, and you should file a feature request for it. Bear in mind, though, that it's a long way off from happening.
The only way this would eventually work is if the rules language had a lambda type where you could pass a predicate function into a method that ensures it only returns true for every element in the list. But that concept doesn't exist right now, so it would require a fair amount of effort to implement.
answered Mar 8 at 23:51
Doug StevensonDoug Stevenson
83.3k10100118
This is not possible today, unless you know the size of the array, and you write an expression to check the element at each index. However, what you're asking is a reasonable thing to want to do, and you should file a feature request for it. Bear in mind, though, that it's a long way off from happening.
The only way this would eventually work is if the rules language had a lambda type where you could pass a predicate function into a method that ensures it only returns true for every element in the list. But that concept doesn't exist right now, so it would require a fair amount of effort to implement.
answered Mar 8 at 23:51
Doug StevensonDoug Stevenson
83.3k10100118
answered Mar 8 at 23:51
Doug StevensonDoug Stevenson
83.3k10100118
answered Mar 8 at 23:51
Doug StevensonDoug Stevenson
83.3k10100118
answered Mar 8 at 23:51
Doug StevensonDoug Stevenson
83.3k10100118
83.3k10100118
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55071893%2ffirestore-rule-only-strings-in-list%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
