How to match the keywords in a given sentence to create Schematron expressions XSLT 2.0 or 3.02019 Community Moderator ElectionXSLT 2.0: filter on matchDynamic cast in XSLT 2.0 or 3.0How xslt 2.0 is variable with key value attribute is different from xslt 3.0 map? Which one will perform faster?making a non logic flat structure hierarchicalHow can I use an XSLT variable containing a pattern in a template match expressionHow to use XSLT 3.0 from a Java application?XSLT 2.0 or 3.0 for Node.js?Parsing plain text in CDATA to html with XSLT 2.0/3.0 using multiple steps. Part way thereXSLT converting style down from 3.0 to 2.0 - variable reference errorHow to replace values using templates match using XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 3.0
When were linguistics departments first established
What has been your most complicated TikZ drawing?
Should QA ask requirements to developers?
Making a sword in the stone, in a medieval world without magic
How could a female member of a species produce eggs unto death?
Is it ok to include an epilogue dedicated to colleagues who passed away in the end of the manuscript?
Need some help with my first LaTeX drawing…
Is a lawful good "antagonist" effective?
What exactly is the purpose of connection links straped between the rocket and the launch pad
What Happens when Passenger Refuses to Fly Boeing 737 Max?
Sword in the Stone story where the sword was held in place by electromagnets
Best approach to update all entries in a list that is paginated?
Unreachable code, but reachable with exception
Confusion with the nameplate of an induction motor
Why do Australian milk farmers need to protest supermarkets' milk price?
"One can do his homework in the library"
Potentiometer like component
Do Bugbears' arms literally get longer when it's their turn?
How to deal with a cynical class?
Draw arrow on sides of triangle
What does おとこえしや mean?
Make a transparent 448*448 image
Replacing Windows 7 security updates with anti-virus?
Counter-example to the existence of left Bousfield localization of combinatorial model category
How to match the keywords in a given sentence to create Schematron expressions XSLT 2.0 or 3.0
2019 Community Moderator ElectionXSLT 2.0: filter on matchDynamic cast in XSLT 2.0 or 3.0How xslt 2.0 is variable with key value attribute is different from xslt 3.0 map? Which one will perform faster?making a non logic flat structure hierarchicalHow can I use an XSLT variable containing a pattern in a template match expressionHow to use XSLT 3.0 from a Java application?XSLT 2.0 or 3.0 for Node.js?Parsing plain text in CDATA to html with XSLT 2.0/3.0 using multiple steps. Part way thereXSLT converting style down from 3.0 to 2.0 - variable reference errorHow to replace values using templates match using XSLT 2.0 or XSLT 3.0
I have been dealing with an issue for a while that is for a multiple given sentences and keywords, I need to match the keywords and find them in the sentence and create another string,based on the order of the sentence for each keyword.
Thus, the keywords list do not have to follow the same order as in sentence. But the order should match as it is in the sentence. Hope it is clear.
The XML Example:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ROOT>
<LIST>
<ID>1</ID>
<MESSAGE>Cats(13) are "lovely" or "beautiful" and Dogs(10) are "loyal" or "friendly".</MESSAGE>
</LIST>
<LIST>
<ID>2</ID>
<MESSAGE>Horses(11) are not a "good" option and Pigs(12) are okay</MESSAGE>
</LIST>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>lovely</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>friendly</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>beautiful</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>loyal</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>good</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>okay</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>10</ID>
<KEYWORD>Dogs</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>11</ID>
<KEYWORD>Horses</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>12</ID>
<KEYWORD>Pigs</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>13</ID>
<KEYWORD>Cats</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>14</ID>
<KEYWORD>aquarium</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>b</ID>
<KEYWORD>Fishes</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>and</SYNTAX>
</OP>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>or</SYNTAX>
</OP>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>are not</SYNTAX>
</OP>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>are</SYNTAX>
</OP>
XSLT that I kinda tried:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:functx="http://www.functx.com" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" exclude-result-prefixes="xs" version="2.0">
<xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes"/>
<xsl:function name="functx:contains-any-of" as="xs:boolean">
<xsl:param name="arg" as="xs:string?"/>
<xsl:param name="searchStrings" as="xs:string*"/>
<xsl:sequence select="
some $searchString in $searchStrings
satisfies contains($arg, $searchString)
"/>
</xsl:function>
<xsl:template match="ROOT">
<xsl:variable name="keyID" select="//KEYWORDS/ID"/>
<xsl:variable name="keyName" select="//KEYWORDS/KEYWORD"/>
<xsl:variable name="keyOp" select="//OP/SYNTAX"/>
<xsl:for-each select="//MESSAGE">
<xsl:variable name="message" select="node()"/>
<xsl:if test="functx:contains-any-of($message, $keyID)">
<xsl:element name="test">
<xsl:value-of select="$keyName"/>
<xsl:value-of select="$keyOp"/>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
Expected output:
<test>Cats = ('lovely','beautiful') and Dogs = ('loyal','friendly')</test>
<test>Horses != 'good' or Pigs = 'okay'</test>
The thing is that, everything here is transformed from Excel file, what i am trying to do is to have automatic transformation. from Excel to Schematron. in this part, I already converted the Excel to XML.
Now, I am trying to get Xpath definitions from the sentences, by using the keywords. Because, these keywords are dynamic. If it chances in excel, has to change all the way down to schematron.
I need to find those keywords in the sentences, by the order of sentence. and operators and adjectives as well. So I can create expressions as I tried to show in the expected output.
I cant change the order or the structure of the sentence. The main idea here is to create an Xpath definition out of the sentences.
UPDATE
So I learned from one of the posts of Martin Honnen that in XSLT 2.0, $name = ('Alice', 'Bob', 'Cindy')
is possible.
UPDATE-2
<xsl:variable name="operator" select="$btbg/node()/SimpleCodeList/Row/Value[@ColumnRef = 'DictionaryEntryName']/SimpleValue/text()"/>
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:variable name="w" select="tokenize(., 's+')"/>
<xsl:value-of select="$w[position() > index-of($w, $w[. = $operator][1])]"/>
</xsl:copy>
I was thinking about this idea to put the sentence in a loop after it finds the keyword till the end. But also could not make it work. $operator
paramater is coming from another XML file. If i do it in this way, I cant get the value recursively. It reads all the operators or any other parameters in the XML.
I want to choose nodes one by one and find them in the sentence. then Cut the sentence there after reading the value, and put the sentence into loop again for the next keyword.
How can I overcome this problem? Thanks in advance.
xml xslt-2.0 xslt-3.0
|
show 1 more comment
I have been dealing with an issue for a while that is for a multiple given sentences and keywords, I need to match the keywords and find them in the sentence and create another string,based on the order of the sentence for each keyword.
Thus, the keywords list do not have to follow the same order as in sentence. But the order should match as it is in the sentence. Hope it is clear.
The XML Example:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ROOT>
<LIST>
<ID>1</ID>
<MESSAGE>Cats(13) are "lovely" or "beautiful" and Dogs(10) are "loyal" or "friendly".</MESSAGE>
</LIST>
<LIST>
<ID>2</ID>
<MESSAGE>Horses(11) are not a "good" option and Pigs(12) are okay</MESSAGE>
</LIST>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>lovely</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>friendly</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>beautiful</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>loyal</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>good</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>okay</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>10</ID>
<KEYWORD>Dogs</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>11</ID>
<KEYWORD>Horses</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>12</ID>
<KEYWORD>Pigs</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>13</ID>
<KEYWORD>Cats</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>14</ID>
<KEYWORD>aquarium</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>b</ID>
<KEYWORD>Fishes</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>and</SYNTAX>
</OP>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>or</SYNTAX>
</OP>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>are not</SYNTAX>
</OP>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>are</SYNTAX>
</OP>
XSLT that I kinda tried:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:functx="http://www.functx.com" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" exclude-result-prefixes="xs" version="2.0">
<xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes"/>
<xsl:function name="functx:contains-any-of" as="xs:boolean">
<xsl:param name="arg" as="xs:string?"/>
<xsl:param name="searchStrings" as="xs:string*"/>
<xsl:sequence select="
some $searchString in $searchStrings
satisfies contains($arg, $searchString)
"/>
</xsl:function>
<xsl:template match="ROOT">
<xsl:variable name="keyID" select="//KEYWORDS/ID"/>
<xsl:variable name="keyName" select="//KEYWORDS/KEYWORD"/>
<xsl:variable name="keyOp" select="//OP/SYNTAX"/>
<xsl:for-each select="//MESSAGE">
<xsl:variable name="message" select="node()"/>
<xsl:if test="functx:contains-any-of($message, $keyID)">
<xsl:element name="test">
<xsl:value-of select="$keyName"/>
<xsl:value-of select="$keyOp"/>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
Expected output:
<test>Cats = ('lovely','beautiful') and Dogs = ('loyal','friendly')</test>
<test>Horses != 'good' or Pigs = 'okay'</test>
The thing is that, everything here is transformed from Excel file, what i am trying to do is to have automatic transformation. from Excel to Schematron. in this part, I already converted the Excel to XML.
Now, I am trying to get Xpath definitions from the sentences, by using the keywords. Because, these keywords are dynamic. If it chances in excel, has to change all the way down to schematron.
I need to find those keywords in the sentences, by the order of sentence. and operators and adjectives as well. So I can create expressions as I tried to show in the expected output.
I cant change the order or the structure of the sentence. The main idea here is to create an Xpath definition out of the sentences.
UPDATE
So I learned from one of the posts of Martin Honnen that in XSLT 2.0, $name = ('Alice', 'Bob', 'Cindy')
is possible.
UPDATE-2
<xsl:variable name="operator" select="$btbg/node()/SimpleCodeList/Row/Value[@ColumnRef = 'DictionaryEntryName']/SimpleValue/text()"/>
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:variable name="w" select="tokenize(., 's+')"/>
<xsl:value-of select="$w[position() > index-of($w, $w[. = $operator][1])]"/>
</xsl:copy>
I was thinking about this idea to put the sentence in a loop after it finds the keyword till the end. But also could not make it work. $operator
paramater is coming from another XML file. If i do it in this way, I cant get the value recursively. It reads all the operators or any other parameters in the XML.
I want to choose nodes one by one and find them in the sentence. then Cut the sentence there after reading the value, and put the sentence into loop again for the next keyword.
How can I overcome this problem? Thanks in advance.
xml xslt-2.0 xslt-3.0
Is the expected output like<test>Cats are "lovely" and Cats are "beautiful" and Dogs are "loyal" and Dogs are "friendly"</test>
Schematron? In your question title and in the text you talk about creating Schematron.
– Martin Honnen
Mar 7 at 10:37
I left a challenging part for myself to change those text operators to "=" "and" "!=" etc. The part I need to create is to test part for schematron validations by the sentences. Sorry if it is confusing. At the end finaly look would be, Cats="lovely" or Cats="lovely" and Dogs="loyal" or Dogs="friendly"
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 7 at 10:43
Hi Martin, Any ideas ? @MartinHonnen
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 8 at 10:51
I am sorry, I don't understand what you want to achieve, for instance why doesHorses(11) are not a "good" option
translate intoHorses = 'good'
, given that the sentence saysnot a good option
? In general analysing human language with program code seems quite a challenge, something that is beyond my abilities and beyond of what can be achieved in a answer to a stackoverflow post. As you do use XSLT 2, you have more thancontains
withtokenize
andmatches
and alsoxsl:analyze-string
but regular expressions are not as complex as is human language.
– Martin Honnen
Mar 8 at 11:28
It is my bad, sorry for the conflicts really. it was really hard to create an example. I fix many things. It is supposed to be != if it is are not of course. In general, the idea is to translate some of the keywords to operators. but the whole process of reading each word has to be in order of the sentence. Thanks for the answers
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 9 at 11:30
|
show 1 more comment
I have been dealing with an issue for a while that is for a multiple given sentences and keywords, I need to match the keywords and find them in the sentence and create another string,based on the order of the sentence for each keyword.
Thus, the keywords list do not have to follow the same order as in sentence. But the order should match as it is in the sentence. Hope it is clear.
The XML Example:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ROOT>
<LIST>
<ID>1</ID>
<MESSAGE>Cats(13) are "lovely" or "beautiful" and Dogs(10) are "loyal" or "friendly".</MESSAGE>
</LIST>
<LIST>
<ID>2</ID>
<MESSAGE>Horses(11) are not a "good" option and Pigs(12) are okay</MESSAGE>
</LIST>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>lovely</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>friendly</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>beautiful</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>loyal</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>good</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>okay</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>10</ID>
<KEYWORD>Dogs</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>11</ID>
<KEYWORD>Horses</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>12</ID>
<KEYWORD>Pigs</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>13</ID>
<KEYWORD>Cats</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>14</ID>
<KEYWORD>aquarium</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>b</ID>
<KEYWORD>Fishes</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>and</SYNTAX>
</OP>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>or</SYNTAX>
</OP>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>are not</SYNTAX>
</OP>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>are</SYNTAX>
</OP>
XSLT that I kinda tried:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:functx="http://www.functx.com" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" exclude-result-prefixes="xs" version="2.0">
<xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes"/>
<xsl:function name="functx:contains-any-of" as="xs:boolean">
<xsl:param name="arg" as="xs:string?"/>
<xsl:param name="searchStrings" as="xs:string*"/>
<xsl:sequence select="
some $searchString in $searchStrings
satisfies contains($arg, $searchString)
"/>
</xsl:function>
<xsl:template match="ROOT">
<xsl:variable name="keyID" select="//KEYWORDS/ID"/>
<xsl:variable name="keyName" select="//KEYWORDS/KEYWORD"/>
<xsl:variable name="keyOp" select="//OP/SYNTAX"/>
<xsl:for-each select="//MESSAGE">
<xsl:variable name="message" select="node()"/>
<xsl:if test="functx:contains-any-of($message, $keyID)">
<xsl:element name="test">
<xsl:value-of select="$keyName"/>
<xsl:value-of select="$keyOp"/>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
Expected output:
<test>Cats = ('lovely','beautiful') and Dogs = ('loyal','friendly')</test>
<test>Horses != 'good' or Pigs = 'okay'</test>
The thing is that, everything here is transformed from Excel file, what i am trying to do is to have automatic transformation. from Excel to Schematron. in this part, I already converted the Excel to XML.
Now, I am trying to get Xpath definitions from the sentences, by using the keywords. Because, these keywords are dynamic. If it chances in excel, has to change all the way down to schematron.
I need to find those keywords in the sentences, by the order of sentence. and operators and adjectives as well. So I can create expressions as I tried to show in the expected output.
I cant change the order or the structure of the sentence. The main idea here is to create an Xpath definition out of the sentences.
UPDATE
So I learned from one of the posts of Martin Honnen that in XSLT 2.0, $name = ('Alice', 'Bob', 'Cindy')
is possible.
UPDATE-2
<xsl:variable name="operator" select="$btbg/node()/SimpleCodeList/Row/Value[@ColumnRef = 'DictionaryEntryName']/SimpleValue/text()"/>
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:variable name="w" select="tokenize(., 's+')"/>
<xsl:value-of select="$w[position() > index-of($w, $w[. = $operator][1])]"/>
</xsl:copy>
I was thinking about this idea to put the sentence in a loop after it finds the keyword till the end. But also could not make it work. $operator
paramater is coming from another XML file. If i do it in this way, I cant get the value recursively. It reads all the operators or any other parameters in the XML.
I want to choose nodes one by one and find them in the sentence. then Cut the sentence there after reading the value, and put the sentence into loop again for the next keyword.
How can I overcome this problem? Thanks in advance.
xml xslt-2.0 xslt-3.0
I have been dealing with an issue for a while that is for a multiple given sentences and keywords, I need to match the keywords and find them in the sentence and create another string,based on the order of the sentence for each keyword.
Thus, the keywords list do not have to follow the same order as in sentence. But the order should match as it is in the sentence. Hope it is clear.
The XML Example:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ROOT>
<LIST>
<ID>1</ID>
<MESSAGE>Cats(13) are "lovely" or "beautiful" and Dogs(10) are "loyal" or "friendly".</MESSAGE>
</LIST>
<LIST>
<ID>2</ID>
<MESSAGE>Horses(11) are not a "good" option and Pigs(12) are okay</MESSAGE>
</LIST>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>lovely</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>friendly</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>beautiful</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>loyal</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>good</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<ADJS>
<ADJ>okay</ADJ>
</ADJS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>10</ID>
<KEYWORD>Dogs</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>11</ID>
<KEYWORD>Horses</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>12</ID>
<KEYWORD>Pigs</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>13</ID>
<KEYWORD>Cats</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>14</ID>
<KEYWORD>aquarium</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<KEYWORDS>
<ID>b</ID>
<KEYWORD>Fishes</KEYWORD>
</KEYWORDS>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>and</SYNTAX>
</OP>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>or</SYNTAX>
</OP>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>are not</SYNTAX>
</OP>
<OP>
<SYNTAX>are</SYNTAX>
</OP>
XSLT that I kinda tried:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:functx="http://www.functx.com" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" exclude-result-prefixes="xs" version="2.0">
<xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes"/>
<xsl:function name="functx:contains-any-of" as="xs:boolean">
<xsl:param name="arg" as="xs:string?"/>
<xsl:param name="searchStrings" as="xs:string*"/>
<xsl:sequence select="
some $searchString in $searchStrings
satisfies contains($arg, $searchString)
"/>
</xsl:function>
<xsl:template match="ROOT">
<xsl:variable name="keyID" select="//KEYWORDS/ID"/>
<xsl:variable name="keyName" select="//KEYWORDS/KEYWORD"/>
<xsl:variable name="keyOp" select="//OP/SYNTAX"/>
<xsl:for-each select="//MESSAGE">
<xsl:variable name="message" select="node()"/>
<xsl:if test="functx:contains-any-of($message, $keyID)">
<xsl:element name="test">
<xsl:value-of select="$keyName"/>
<xsl:value-of select="$keyOp"/>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:if>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
Expected output:
<test>Cats = ('lovely','beautiful') and Dogs = ('loyal','friendly')</test>
<test>Horses != 'good' or Pigs = 'okay'</test>
The thing is that, everything here is transformed from Excel file, what i am trying to do is to have automatic transformation. from Excel to Schematron. in this part, I already converted the Excel to XML.
Now, I am trying to get Xpath definitions from the sentences, by using the keywords. Because, these keywords are dynamic. If it chances in excel, has to change all the way down to schematron.
I need to find those keywords in the sentences, by the order of sentence. and operators and adjectives as well. So I can create expressions as I tried to show in the expected output.
I cant change the order or the structure of the sentence. The main idea here is to create an Xpath definition out of the sentences.
UPDATE
So I learned from one of the posts of Martin Honnen that in XSLT 2.0, $name = ('Alice', 'Bob', 'Cindy')
is possible.
UPDATE-2
<xsl:variable name="operator" select="$btbg/node()/SimpleCodeList/Row/Value[@ColumnRef = 'DictionaryEntryName']/SimpleValue/text()"/>
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:variable name="w" select="tokenize(., 's+')"/>
<xsl:value-of select="$w[position() > index-of($w, $w[. = $operator][1])]"/>
</xsl:copy>
I was thinking about this idea to put the sentence in a loop after it finds the keyword till the end. But also could not make it work. $operator
paramater is coming from another XML file. If i do it in this way, I cant get the value recursively. It reads all the operators or any other parameters in the XML.
I want to choose nodes one by one and find them in the sentence. then Cut the sentence there after reading the value, and put the sentence into loop again for the next keyword.
How can I overcome this problem? Thanks in advance.
xml xslt-2.0 xslt-3.0
xml xslt-2.0 xslt-3.0
edited 2 days ago
Sojimanatsu
asked Mar 7 at 9:21
SojimanatsuSojimanatsu
176115
176115
Is the expected output like<test>Cats are "lovely" and Cats are "beautiful" and Dogs are "loyal" and Dogs are "friendly"</test>
Schematron? In your question title and in the text you talk about creating Schematron.
– Martin Honnen
Mar 7 at 10:37
I left a challenging part for myself to change those text operators to "=" "and" "!=" etc. The part I need to create is to test part for schematron validations by the sentences. Sorry if it is confusing. At the end finaly look would be, Cats="lovely" or Cats="lovely" and Dogs="loyal" or Dogs="friendly"
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 7 at 10:43
Hi Martin, Any ideas ? @MartinHonnen
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 8 at 10:51
I am sorry, I don't understand what you want to achieve, for instance why doesHorses(11) are not a "good" option
translate intoHorses = 'good'
, given that the sentence saysnot a good option
? In general analysing human language with program code seems quite a challenge, something that is beyond my abilities and beyond of what can be achieved in a answer to a stackoverflow post. As you do use XSLT 2, you have more thancontains
withtokenize
andmatches
and alsoxsl:analyze-string
but regular expressions are not as complex as is human language.
– Martin Honnen
Mar 8 at 11:28
It is my bad, sorry for the conflicts really. it was really hard to create an example. I fix many things. It is supposed to be != if it is are not of course. In general, the idea is to translate some of the keywords to operators. but the whole process of reading each word has to be in order of the sentence. Thanks for the answers
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 9 at 11:30
|
show 1 more comment
Is the expected output like<test>Cats are "lovely" and Cats are "beautiful" and Dogs are "loyal" and Dogs are "friendly"</test>
Schematron? In your question title and in the text you talk about creating Schematron.
– Martin Honnen
Mar 7 at 10:37
I left a challenging part for myself to change those text operators to "=" "and" "!=" etc. The part I need to create is to test part for schematron validations by the sentences. Sorry if it is confusing. At the end finaly look would be, Cats="lovely" or Cats="lovely" and Dogs="loyal" or Dogs="friendly"
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 7 at 10:43
Hi Martin, Any ideas ? @MartinHonnen
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 8 at 10:51
I am sorry, I don't understand what you want to achieve, for instance why doesHorses(11) are not a "good" option
translate intoHorses = 'good'
, given that the sentence saysnot a good option
? In general analysing human language with program code seems quite a challenge, something that is beyond my abilities and beyond of what can be achieved in a answer to a stackoverflow post. As you do use XSLT 2, you have more thancontains
withtokenize
andmatches
and alsoxsl:analyze-string
but regular expressions are not as complex as is human language.
– Martin Honnen
Mar 8 at 11:28
It is my bad, sorry for the conflicts really. it was really hard to create an example. I fix many things. It is supposed to be != if it is are not of course. In general, the idea is to translate some of the keywords to operators. but the whole process of reading each word has to be in order of the sentence. Thanks for the answers
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 9 at 11:30
Is the expected output like
<test>Cats are "lovely" and Cats are "beautiful" and Dogs are "loyal" and Dogs are "friendly"</test>
Schematron? In your question title and in the text you talk about creating Schematron.– Martin Honnen
Mar 7 at 10:37
Is the expected output like
<test>Cats are "lovely" and Cats are "beautiful" and Dogs are "loyal" and Dogs are "friendly"</test>
Schematron? In your question title and in the text you talk about creating Schematron.– Martin Honnen
Mar 7 at 10:37
I left a challenging part for myself to change those text operators to "=" "and" "!=" etc. The part I need to create is to test part for schematron validations by the sentences. Sorry if it is confusing. At the end finaly look would be, Cats="lovely" or Cats="lovely" and Dogs="loyal" or Dogs="friendly"
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 7 at 10:43
I left a challenging part for myself to change those text operators to "=" "and" "!=" etc. The part I need to create is to test part for schematron validations by the sentences. Sorry if it is confusing. At the end finaly look would be, Cats="lovely" or Cats="lovely" and Dogs="loyal" or Dogs="friendly"
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 7 at 10:43
Hi Martin, Any ideas ? @MartinHonnen
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 8 at 10:51
Hi Martin, Any ideas ? @MartinHonnen
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 8 at 10:51
I am sorry, I don't understand what you want to achieve, for instance why does
Horses(11) are not a "good" option
translate into Horses = 'good'
, given that the sentence says not a good option
? In general analysing human language with program code seems quite a challenge, something that is beyond my abilities and beyond of what can be achieved in a answer to a stackoverflow post. As you do use XSLT 2, you have more than contains
with tokenize
and matches
and also xsl:analyze-string
but regular expressions are not as complex as is human language.– Martin Honnen
Mar 8 at 11:28
I am sorry, I don't understand what you want to achieve, for instance why does
Horses(11) are not a "good" option
translate into Horses = 'good'
, given that the sentence says not a good option
? In general analysing human language with program code seems quite a challenge, something that is beyond my abilities and beyond of what can be achieved in a answer to a stackoverflow post. As you do use XSLT 2, you have more than contains
with tokenize
and matches
and also xsl:analyze-string
but regular expressions are not as complex as is human language.– Martin Honnen
Mar 8 at 11:28
It is my bad, sorry for the conflicts really. it was really hard to create an example. I fix many things. It is supposed to be != if it is are not of course. In general, the idea is to translate some of the keywords to operators. but the whole process of reading each word has to be in order of the sentence. Thanks for the answers
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 9 at 11:30
It is my bad, sorry for the conflicts really. it was really hard to create an example. I fix many things. It is supposed to be != if it is are not of course. In general, the idea is to translate some of the keywords to operators. but the whole process of reading each word has to be in order of the sentence. Thanks for the answers
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 9 at 11:30
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55040138%2fhow-to-match-the-keywords-in-a-given-sentence-to-create-schematron-expressions-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55040138%2fhow-to-match-the-keywords-in-a-given-sentence-to-create-schematron-expressions-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Is the expected output like
<test>Cats are "lovely" and Cats are "beautiful" and Dogs are "loyal" and Dogs are "friendly"</test>
Schematron? In your question title and in the text you talk about creating Schematron.– Martin Honnen
Mar 7 at 10:37
I left a challenging part for myself to change those text operators to "=" "and" "!=" etc. The part I need to create is to test part for schematron validations by the sentences. Sorry if it is confusing. At the end finaly look would be, Cats="lovely" or Cats="lovely" and Dogs="loyal" or Dogs="friendly"
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 7 at 10:43
Hi Martin, Any ideas ? @MartinHonnen
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 8 at 10:51
I am sorry, I don't understand what you want to achieve, for instance why does
Horses(11) are not a "good" option
translate intoHorses = 'good'
, given that the sentence saysnot a good option
? In general analysing human language with program code seems quite a challenge, something that is beyond my abilities and beyond of what can be achieved in a answer to a stackoverflow post. As you do use XSLT 2, you have more thancontains
withtokenize
andmatches
and alsoxsl:analyze-string
but regular expressions are not as complex as is human language.– Martin Honnen
Mar 8 at 11:28
It is my bad, sorry for the conflicts really. it was really hard to create an example. I fix many things. It is supposed to be != if it is are not of course. In general, the idea is to translate some of the keywords to operators. but the whole process of reading each word has to be in order of the sentence. Thanks for the answers
– Sojimanatsu
Mar 9 at 11:30