A peculiar integral identityVerification of integral over $exp(cos x + sin x)$Integral $int_0^infty fracsin xcosh ax+cos xfracxx^2-pi^2dx=tan^-1left(frac1aright)-frac1a$Sine and Bessel integral extension to imaginary argumentChanging argument into complex in the integral of Bessel multiplied by cosineDerivation of Gradshteyn and Ryzhik integral 3.876.1 (in question)Simpler proof of an integral representation of Bessel function of the first kind $J_n(x)$Fourier Cosine Transform (Parseval Identity) for definite integralA definite integral of the exponential of cosIs there any way to evaluate $int_0^infty cos(bx) sinh(pi x) left[ K_ix(a) right]^2 , dx?$A definite integral on a circle with Bessel functions

Is this Paypal Github SDK reference really a dangerous site?

Does a difference of tense count as a difference of meaning in a minimal pair?

Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?

Are small insurances worth it?

Professor forcing me to attend a conference, I can't afford even with 50% funding

Is a piano played in the same way as a harmonium?

Are all players supposed to be able to see each others' character sheets?

Having the player face themselves after the mid-game

School performs periodic password audits. Is my password compromised?

How do spaceships determine each other's mass in space?

What will happen if my luggage gets delayed?

Can one live in the U.S. and not use a credit card?

What is Tony Stark injecting into himself in Iron Man 3?

I reported the illegal activity of my boss to his boss. My boss found out. Now I am being punished. What should I do?

What is this diamond of every day?

Plausibility of Mushroom Buildings

Does Christianity allow for believing on someone else's behalf?

Why restrict private health insurance?

In the late 1940’s to early 1950’s what technology was available that could melt a LOT of ice?

What do *foreign films* mean for an American?

Trig Subsitution When There's No Square Root

MySQL importing CSV files really slow

Is it a Cyclops number? "Nobody" knows!

What can I do if someone tampers with my SSH public key?



A peculiar integral identity


Verification of integral over $exp(cos x + sin x)$Integral $int_0^infty fracsin xcosh ax+cos xfracxx^2-pi^2dx=tan^-1left(frac1aright)-frac1a$Sine and Bessel integral extension to imaginary argumentChanging argument into complex in the integral of Bessel multiplied by cosineDerivation of Gradshteyn and Ryzhik integral 3.876.1 (in question)Simpler proof of an integral representation of Bessel function of the first kind $J_n(x)$Fourier Cosine Transform (Parseval Identity) for definite integralA definite integral of the exponential of cosIs there any way to evaluate $int_0^infty cos(bx) sinh(pi x) left[ K_ix(a) right]^2 , dx?$A definite integral on a circle with Bessel functions













7












$begingroup$


Here I was, innocently trying to solve this daunting-looking integral



$$int_0^pi e^v cos theta cos t cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt $$



when the inner beauty behind this beast slowly started to disclose itself.




Of course, the first thing I did, was checking if WolframAlpha can help, futilely.

Next on my lookup table was Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. Yet again, the god of integrals had no mercy upon me and I was left to my own device.




To get a first impression I plotted the function, that needs to be integrated, that is for $f_theta(t) = e^cos theta cos t cosh(sin theta sin t)$, we get the following plots:



enter image description here



Okay, nothing too special about that. So I proceeded by trying to numerically evaluate the integral itself. And then, something strange happened...




Turns out the integral is invariant under $theta$!

Even better, we have




$$int_0^pi e^v cos theta cos t cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt = int_0^pi e^v cos t dt = pi I_0(v)quad forall theta in [-pi,pi]; ,$$




where for the first equality I just set $theta = 0$ and the second equality is a known identity of the modified Bessel function of the first kind. Now, I only stumbled upon this identity numerically, and I was wondering if someone can share some analytical wisdom regarding this. Put into a question:




Does someone know, why this identity holds?





Bonus



I now face the same integral but with an additional linear term, that is



$$int_0^pi tf_theta(t)dt ; ,$$
with $f_theta$ as defined above. I am hoping that the techniques that illuminate the identity above will also shed some light at this new integral, which by the way is not constant in $theta$ anymore.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What's $I_0(v)$?
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    Mar 6 at 23:03










  • $begingroup$
    @YiFan the modified Bessel function of the first kind.
    $endgroup$
    – chickenNinja123
    Mar 6 at 23:06







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Did you try using the fact that $colorbluee^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t) =frac12left(e^vcos(t-theta) + e^vcos(t+theta)right)$? (Obtained by using $cosh u = frac12left( e^u + e^-uright)$ and the cosine addition formulas ($cos(Apm B) = cos A cos B mp sin A sin B$))
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    Mar 6 at 23:18
















7












$begingroup$


Here I was, innocently trying to solve this daunting-looking integral



$$int_0^pi e^v cos theta cos t cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt $$



when the inner beauty behind this beast slowly started to disclose itself.




Of course, the first thing I did, was checking if WolframAlpha can help, futilely.

Next on my lookup table was Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. Yet again, the god of integrals had no mercy upon me and I was left to my own device.




To get a first impression I plotted the function, that needs to be integrated, that is for $f_theta(t) = e^cos theta cos t cosh(sin theta sin t)$, we get the following plots:



enter image description here



Okay, nothing too special about that. So I proceeded by trying to numerically evaluate the integral itself. And then, something strange happened...




Turns out the integral is invariant under $theta$!

Even better, we have




$$int_0^pi e^v cos theta cos t cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt = int_0^pi e^v cos t dt = pi I_0(v)quad forall theta in [-pi,pi]; ,$$




where for the first equality I just set $theta = 0$ and the second equality is a known identity of the modified Bessel function of the first kind. Now, I only stumbled upon this identity numerically, and I was wondering if someone can share some analytical wisdom regarding this. Put into a question:




Does someone know, why this identity holds?





Bonus



I now face the same integral but with an additional linear term, that is



$$int_0^pi tf_theta(t)dt ; ,$$
with $f_theta$ as defined above. I am hoping that the techniques that illuminate the identity above will also shed some light at this new integral, which by the way is not constant in $theta$ anymore.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    What's $I_0(v)$?
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    Mar 6 at 23:03










  • $begingroup$
    @YiFan the modified Bessel function of the first kind.
    $endgroup$
    – chickenNinja123
    Mar 6 at 23:06







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Did you try using the fact that $colorbluee^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t) =frac12left(e^vcos(t-theta) + e^vcos(t+theta)right)$? (Obtained by using $cosh u = frac12left( e^u + e^-uright)$ and the cosine addition formulas ($cos(Apm B) = cos A cos B mp sin A sin B$))
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    Mar 6 at 23:18














7












7








7


3



$begingroup$


Here I was, innocently trying to solve this daunting-looking integral



$$int_0^pi e^v cos theta cos t cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt $$



when the inner beauty behind this beast slowly started to disclose itself.




Of course, the first thing I did, was checking if WolframAlpha can help, futilely.

Next on my lookup table was Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. Yet again, the god of integrals had no mercy upon me and I was left to my own device.




To get a first impression I plotted the function, that needs to be integrated, that is for $f_theta(t) = e^cos theta cos t cosh(sin theta sin t)$, we get the following plots:



enter image description here



Okay, nothing too special about that. So I proceeded by trying to numerically evaluate the integral itself. And then, something strange happened...




Turns out the integral is invariant under $theta$!

Even better, we have




$$int_0^pi e^v cos theta cos t cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt = int_0^pi e^v cos t dt = pi I_0(v)quad forall theta in [-pi,pi]; ,$$




where for the first equality I just set $theta = 0$ and the second equality is a known identity of the modified Bessel function of the first kind. Now, I only stumbled upon this identity numerically, and I was wondering if someone can share some analytical wisdom regarding this. Put into a question:




Does someone know, why this identity holds?





Bonus



I now face the same integral but with an additional linear term, that is



$$int_0^pi tf_theta(t)dt ; ,$$
with $f_theta$ as defined above. I am hoping that the techniques that illuminate the identity above will also shed some light at this new integral, which by the way is not constant in $theta$ anymore.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Here I was, innocently trying to solve this daunting-looking integral



$$int_0^pi e^v cos theta cos t cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt $$



when the inner beauty behind this beast slowly started to disclose itself.




Of course, the first thing I did, was checking if WolframAlpha can help, futilely.

Next on my lookup table was Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. Yet again, the god of integrals had no mercy upon me and I was left to my own device.




To get a first impression I plotted the function, that needs to be integrated, that is for $f_theta(t) = e^cos theta cos t cosh(sin theta sin t)$, we get the following plots:



enter image description here



Okay, nothing too special about that. So I proceeded by trying to numerically evaluate the integral itself. And then, something strange happened...




Turns out the integral is invariant under $theta$!

Even better, we have




$$int_0^pi e^v cos theta cos t cosh(v sin theta sin t) dt = int_0^pi e^v cos t dt = pi I_0(v)quad forall theta in [-pi,pi]; ,$$




where for the first equality I just set $theta = 0$ and the second equality is a known identity of the modified Bessel function of the first kind. Now, I only stumbled upon this identity numerically, and I was wondering if someone can share some analytical wisdom regarding this. Put into a question:




Does someone know, why this identity holds?





Bonus



I now face the same integral but with an additional linear term, that is



$$int_0^pi tf_theta(t)dt ; ,$$
with $f_theta$ as defined above. I am hoping that the techniques that illuminate the identity above will also shed some light at this new integral, which by the way is not constant in $theta$ anymore.







integration trigonometry definite-integrals bessel-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 6 at 23:03







chickenNinja123

















asked Mar 6 at 22:32









chickenNinja123chickenNinja123

11413




11413











  • $begingroup$
    What's $I_0(v)$?
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    Mar 6 at 23:03










  • $begingroup$
    @YiFan the modified Bessel function of the first kind.
    $endgroup$
    – chickenNinja123
    Mar 6 at 23:06







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Did you try using the fact that $colorbluee^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t) =frac12left(e^vcos(t-theta) + e^vcos(t+theta)right)$? (Obtained by using $cosh u = frac12left( e^u + e^-uright)$ and the cosine addition formulas ($cos(Apm B) = cos A cos B mp sin A sin B$))
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    Mar 6 at 23:18

















  • $begingroup$
    What's $I_0(v)$?
    $endgroup$
    – YiFan
    Mar 6 at 23:03










  • $begingroup$
    @YiFan the modified Bessel function of the first kind.
    $endgroup$
    – chickenNinja123
    Mar 6 at 23:06







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Did you try using the fact that $colorbluee^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t) =frac12left(e^vcos(t-theta) + e^vcos(t+theta)right)$? (Obtained by using $cosh u = frac12left( e^u + e^-uright)$ and the cosine addition formulas ($cos(Apm B) = cos A cos B mp sin A sin B$))
    $endgroup$
    – Minus One-Twelfth
    Mar 6 at 23:18
















$begingroup$
What's $I_0(v)$?
$endgroup$
– YiFan
Mar 6 at 23:03




$begingroup$
What's $I_0(v)$?
$endgroup$
– YiFan
Mar 6 at 23:03












$begingroup$
@YiFan the modified Bessel function of the first kind.
$endgroup$
– chickenNinja123
Mar 6 at 23:06





$begingroup$
@YiFan the modified Bessel function of the first kind.
$endgroup$
– chickenNinja123
Mar 6 at 23:06





1




1




$begingroup$
Did you try using the fact that $colorbluee^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t) =frac12left(e^vcos(t-theta) + e^vcos(t+theta)right)$? (Obtained by using $cosh u = frac12left( e^u + e^-uright)$ and the cosine addition formulas ($cos(Apm B) = cos A cos B mp sin A sin B$))
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
Mar 6 at 23:18





$begingroup$
Did you try using the fact that $colorbluee^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t) =frac12left(e^vcos(t-theta) + e^vcos(t+theta)right)$? (Obtained by using $cosh u = frac12left( e^u + e^-uright)$ and the cosine addition formulas ($cos(Apm B) = cos A cos B mp sin A sin B$))
$endgroup$
– Minus One-Twelfth
Mar 6 at 23:18











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

For the main problem, a bit of algebra:
beginalign*e^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t) &= e^vcosthetacos tleft(e^vsinthetasin t+e^-vsinthetasin tright)\
&= frac12left(e^vcosthetacos t+vsinthetasin t+e^vcosthetacos t-vsinthetasin tright)\
&= frac12left(e^vcos(theta-t)+e^vcos(theta+t)right)endalign*

Now we integrate that:
beginalign*int_0^pie^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t),dt &= frac12int_0^pie^vcos(theta-t)+e^vcos(theta+t),dt\
&=frac12left(int_0^pie^vcos(theta+t),dt+int_-pi^0e^vcos(theta+s),dsright)\
&=frac12int_-pi^pie^vcos(theta+t),dt = frac12int_-pi-theta^pi-thetae^vcos s,dsendalign*

Flipping $theta-t$ to $theta+s$ gives us an integral over the other half of the period - and it's the same function, so we just write it as one integral. Then, in that final integral of $e^vcos s$ over one full period, it doesn't matter where that period is; from $-pi$ to $pi$ is the same as from $-pi-theta$ to $pi-theta$.



That leaves us with the Bessel function identity, that the average value of $e^vcos t$ over a full period is $I_0(cos v)$. For this, since Bessel functions are defined by a differential equation, we differentiate (under the integral sign):
beginalign*I(v) &= frac12piint_0^2pie^vcostheta,dtheta\
I'(v) &= frac12piint_0^2picosthetacdot e^vcostheta,dtheta\
I''(v) &= frac12piint_0^2picos^2thetacdot e^vcostheta,dtheta\
I'(v) &= frac12pileft[sinthetacdot e^vcosthetaright]_theta=0^theta=2pi +frac12piint_0^2pisinthetacdot vsinthetacdot e^vcostheta,dtheta\
I'(v) &= fracv2piint_0^2pisin^2thetacdot e^vcostheta,dthetaendalign*

The first three lines are $I$ and its derivatives, calculated the obvious way. Then, in the next two, we apply integration by parts to transform the $I'$ integral into a form that works better with the others. Then, from $cos^2+sin^2=1$, we get $vI''(v)+I'(v)-vI(v)=0$, the modified Bessel equation of order zero. Together with the initial condition $I(0)=1$ (since the average value of $1$ is $1$) and $I'(0)=0$, this gives that $I(v)=I_0(v)$. Done.



A brief note on the bonus question: we can apply the same identities, but we run into trouble when we try to fold over and transform the $e^vcos(theta-t)$ term into an integral over $[-pi,0]$. The way the $t$ factor transforms, we end up with
$$frac12int_-pi^pi|t|cdot e^vcos(theta+t),dt$$
Multiplying by a triangle wave isn't going to come out cleanly. I might look at Fourier series next, but not in this answer.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    Note that
    $$beginalign*
    I_theta &= frac14int_0^2pie^vcosthetacos tleft(e^vsinthetasin t+e^-vsinthetasin tright) mathrm dt\&=frac14int_0^2pie^vcos(t-theta) mathrm dt+frac14int_0^2pie^vcos(t+theta) mathrm dt.
    endalign*$$
    Because $tmapsto e^vcos t$ is $2pi$-periodic, we have
    $$
    int_0^2pie^vcos(t-theta) mathrm dt=int_0^2pie^vcos(t+theta) mathrm dt=int_0^2pie^vcos t mathrm dt
    $$
    so it follows that
    $$
    I_theta = frac 12int_0^2pie^vcos t mathrm dt =int_0^pi e^vcos t mathrm dt.
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3138187%2fa-peculiar-integral-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      8












      $begingroup$

      For the main problem, a bit of algebra:
      beginalign*e^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t) &= e^vcosthetacos tleft(e^vsinthetasin t+e^-vsinthetasin tright)\
      &= frac12left(e^vcosthetacos t+vsinthetasin t+e^vcosthetacos t-vsinthetasin tright)\
      &= frac12left(e^vcos(theta-t)+e^vcos(theta+t)right)endalign*

      Now we integrate that:
      beginalign*int_0^pie^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t),dt &= frac12int_0^pie^vcos(theta-t)+e^vcos(theta+t),dt\
      &=frac12left(int_0^pie^vcos(theta+t),dt+int_-pi^0e^vcos(theta+s),dsright)\
      &=frac12int_-pi^pie^vcos(theta+t),dt = frac12int_-pi-theta^pi-thetae^vcos s,dsendalign*

      Flipping $theta-t$ to $theta+s$ gives us an integral over the other half of the period - and it's the same function, so we just write it as one integral. Then, in that final integral of $e^vcos s$ over one full period, it doesn't matter where that period is; from $-pi$ to $pi$ is the same as from $-pi-theta$ to $pi-theta$.



      That leaves us with the Bessel function identity, that the average value of $e^vcos t$ over a full period is $I_0(cos v)$. For this, since Bessel functions are defined by a differential equation, we differentiate (under the integral sign):
      beginalign*I(v) &= frac12piint_0^2pie^vcostheta,dtheta\
      I'(v) &= frac12piint_0^2picosthetacdot e^vcostheta,dtheta\
      I''(v) &= frac12piint_0^2picos^2thetacdot e^vcostheta,dtheta\
      I'(v) &= frac12pileft[sinthetacdot e^vcosthetaright]_theta=0^theta=2pi +frac12piint_0^2pisinthetacdot vsinthetacdot e^vcostheta,dtheta\
      I'(v) &= fracv2piint_0^2pisin^2thetacdot e^vcostheta,dthetaendalign*

      The first three lines are $I$ and its derivatives, calculated the obvious way. Then, in the next two, we apply integration by parts to transform the $I'$ integral into a form that works better with the others. Then, from $cos^2+sin^2=1$, we get $vI''(v)+I'(v)-vI(v)=0$, the modified Bessel equation of order zero. Together with the initial condition $I(0)=1$ (since the average value of $1$ is $1$) and $I'(0)=0$, this gives that $I(v)=I_0(v)$. Done.



      A brief note on the bonus question: we can apply the same identities, but we run into trouble when we try to fold over and transform the $e^vcos(theta-t)$ term into an integral over $[-pi,0]$. The way the $t$ factor transforms, we end up with
      $$frac12int_-pi^pi|t|cdot e^vcos(theta+t),dt$$
      Multiplying by a triangle wave isn't going to come out cleanly. I might look at Fourier series next, but not in this answer.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        8












        $begingroup$

        For the main problem, a bit of algebra:
        beginalign*e^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t) &= e^vcosthetacos tleft(e^vsinthetasin t+e^-vsinthetasin tright)\
        &= frac12left(e^vcosthetacos t+vsinthetasin t+e^vcosthetacos t-vsinthetasin tright)\
        &= frac12left(e^vcos(theta-t)+e^vcos(theta+t)right)endalign*

        Now we integrate that:
        beginalign*int_0^pie^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t),dt &= frac12int_0^pie^vcos(theta-t)+e^vcos(theta+t),dt\
        &=frac12left(int_0^pie^vcos(theta+t),dt+int_-pi^0e^vcos(theta+s),dsright)\
        &=frac12int_-pi^pie^vcos(theta+t),dt = frac12int_-pi-theta^pi-thetae^vcos s,dsendalign*

        Flipping $theta-t$ to $theta+s$ gives us an integral over the other half of the period - and it's the same function, so we just write it as one integral. Then, in that final integral of $e^vcos s$ over one full period, it doesn't matter where that period is; from $-pi$ to $pi$ is the same as from $-pi-theta$ to $pi-theta$.



        That leaves us with the Bessel function identity, that the average value of $e^vcos t$ over a full period is $I_0(cos v)$. For this, since Bessel functions are defined by a differential equation, we differentiate (under the integral sign):
        beginalign*I(v) &= frac12piint_0^2pie^vcostheta,dtheta\
        I'(v) &= frac12piint_0^2picosthetacdot e^vcostheta,dtheta\
        I''(v) &= frac12piint_0^2picos^2thetacdot e^vcostheta,dtheta\
        I'(v) &= frac12pileft[sinthetacdot e^vcosthetaright]_theta=0^theta=2pi +frac12piint_0^2pisinthetacdot vsinthetacdot e^vcostheta,dtheta\
        I'(v) &= fracv2piint_0^2pisin^2thetacdot e^vcostheta,dthetaendalign*

        The first three lines are $I$ and its derivatives, calculated the obvious way. Then, in the next two, we apply integration by parts to transform the $I'$ integral into a form that works better with the others. Then, from $cos^2+sin^2=1$, we get $vI''(v)+I'(v)-vI(v)=0$, the modified Bessel equation of order zero. Together with the initial condition $I(0)=1$ (since the average value of $1$ is $1$) and $I'(0)=0$, this gives that $I(v)=I_0(v)$. Done.



        A brief note on the bonus question: we can apply the same identities, but we run into trouble when we try to fold over and transform the $e^vcos(theta-t)$ term into an integral over $[-pi,0]$. The way the $t$ factor transforms, we end up with
        $$frac12int_-pi^pi|t|cdot e^vcos(theta+t),dt$$
        Multiplying by a triangle wave isn't going to come out cleanly. I might look at Fourier series next, but not in this answer.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          8












          8








          8





          $begingroup$

          For the main problem, a bit of algebra:
          beginalign*e^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t) &= e^vcosthetacos tleft(e^vsinthetasin t+e^-vsinthetasin tright)\
          &= frac12left(e^vcosthetacos t+vsinthetasin t+e^vcosthetacos t-vsinthetasin tright)\
          &= frac12left(e^vcos(theta-t)+e^vcos(theta+t)right)endalign*

          Now we integrate that:
          beginalign*int_0^pie^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t),dt &= frac12int_0^pie^vcos(theta-t)+e^vcos(theta+t),dt\
          &=frac12left(int_0^pie^vcos(theta+t),dt+int_-pi^0e^vcos(theta+s),dsright)\
          &=frac12int_-pi^pie^vcos(theta+t),dt = frac12int_-pi-theta^pi-thetae^vcos s,dsendalign*

          Flipping $theta-t$ to $theta+s$ gives us an integral over the other half of the period - and it's the same function, so we just write it as one integral. Then, in that final integral of $e^vcos s$ over one full period, it doesn't matter where that period is; from $-pi$ to $pi$ is the same as from $-pi-theta$ to $pi-theta$.



          That leaves us with the Bessel function identity, that the average value of $e^vcos t$ over a full period is $I_0(cos v)$. For this, since Bessel functions are defined by a differential equation, we differentiate (under the integral sign):
          beginalign*I(v) &= frac12piint_0^2pie^vcostheta,dtheta\
          I'(v) &= frac12piint_0^2picosthetacdot e^vcostheta,dtheta\
          I''(v) &= frac12piint_0^2picos^2thetacdot e^vcostheta,dtheta\
          I'(v) &= frac12pileft[sinthetacdot e^vcosthetaright]_theta=0^theta=2pi +frac12piint_0^2pisinthetacdot vsinthetacdot e^vcostheta,dtheta\
          I'(v) &= fracv2piint_0^2pisin^2thetacdot e^vcostheta,dthetaendalign*

          The first three lines are $I$ and its derivatives, calculated the obvious way. Then, in the next two, we apply integration by parts to transform the $I'$ integral into a form that works better with the others. Then, from $cos^2+sin^2=1$, we get $vI''(v)+I'(v)-vI(v)=0$, the modified Bessel equation of order zero. Together with the initial condition $I(0)=1$ (since the average value of $1$ is $1$) and $I'(0)=0$, this gives that $I(v)=I_0(v)$. Done.



          A brief note on the bonus question: we can apply the same identities, but we run into trouble when we try to fold over and transform the $e^vcos(theta-t)$ term into an integral over $[-pi,0]$. The way the $t$ factor transforms, we end up with
          $$frac12int_-pi^pi|t|cdot e^vcos(theta+t),dt$$
          Multiplying by a triangle wave isn't going to come out cleanly. I might look at Fourier series next, but not in this answer.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          For the main problem, a bit of algebra:
          beginalign*e^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t) &= e^vcosthetacos tleft(e^vsinthetasin t+e^-vsinthetasin tright)\
          &= frac12left(e^vcosthetacos t+vsinthetasin t+e^vcosthetacos t-vsinthetasin tright)\
          &= frac12left(e^vcos(theta-t)+e^vcos(theta+t)right)endalign*

          Now we integrate that:
          beginalign*int_0^pie^vcosthetacos tcosh(vsinthetasin t),dt &= frac12int_0^pie^vcos(theta-t)+e^vcos(theta+t),dt\
          &=frac12left(int_0^pie^vcos(theta+t),dt+int_-pi^0e^vcos(theta+s),dsright)\
          &=frac12int_-pi^pie^vcos(theta+t),dt = frac12int_-pi-theta^pi-thetae^vcos s,dsendalign*

          Flipping $theta-t$ to $theta+s$ gives us an integral over the other half of the period - and it's the same function, so we just write it as one integral. Then, in that final integral of $e^vcos s$ over one full period, it doesn't matter where that period is; from $-pi$ to $pi$ is the same as from $-pi-theta$ to $pi-theta$.



          That leaves us with the Bessel function identity, that the average value of $e^vcos t$ over a full period is $I_0(cos v)$. For this, since Bessel functions are defined by a differential equation, we differentiate (under the integral sign):
          beginalign*I(v) &= frac12piint_0^2pie^vcostheta,dtheta\
          I'(v) &= frac12piint_0^2picosthetacdot e^vcostheta,dtheta\
          I''(v) &= frac12piint_0^2picos^2thetacdot e^vcostheta,dtheta\
          I'(v) &= frac12pileft[sinthetacdot e^vcosthetaright]_theta=0^theta=2pi +frac12piint_0^2pisinthetacdot vsinthetacdot e^vcostheta,dtheta\
          I'(v) &= fracv2piint_0^2pisin^2thetacdot e^vcostheta,dthetaendalign*

          The first three lines are $I$ and its derivatives, calculated the obvious way. Then, in the next two, we apply integration by parts to transform the $I'$ integral into a form that works better with the others. Then, from $cos^2+sin^2=1$, we get $vI''(v)+I'(v)-vI(v)=0$, the modified Bessel equation of order zero. Together with the initial condition $I(0)=1$ (since the average value of $1$ is $1$) and $I'(0)=0$, this gives that $I(v)=I_0(v)$. Done.



          A brief note on the bonus question: we can apply the same identities, but we run into trouble when we try to fold over and transform the $e^vcos(theta-t)$ term into an integral over $[-pi,0]$. The way the $t$ factor transforms, we end up with
          $$frac12int_-pi^pi|t|cdot e^vcos(theta+t),dt$$
          Multiplying by a triangle wave isn't going to come out cleanly. I might look at Fourier series next, but not in this answer.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Mar 6 at 23:14









          jmerryjmerry

          13.1k1628




          13.1k1628





















              2












              $begingroup$

              Note that
              $$beginalign*
              I_theta &= frac14int_0^2pie^vcosthetacos tleft(e^vsinthetasin t+e^-vsinthetasin tright) mathrm dt\&=frac14int_0^2pie^vcos(t-theta) mathrm dt+frac14int_0^2pie^vcos(t+theta) mathrm dt.
              endalign*$$
              Because $tmapsto e^vcos t$ is $2pi$-periodic, we have
              $$
              int_0^2pie^vcos(t-theta) mathrm dt=int_0^2pie^vcos(t+theta) mathrm dt=int_0^2pie^vcos t mathrm dt
              $$
              so it follows that
              $$
              I_theta = frac 12int_0^2pie^vcos t mathrm dt =int_0^pi e^vcos t mathrm dt.
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                2












                $begingroup$

                Note that
                $$beginalign*
                I_theta &= frac14int_0^2pie^vcosthetacos tleft(e^vsinthetasin t+e^-vsinthetasin tright) mathrm dt\&=frac14int_0^2pie^vcos(t-theta) mathrm dt+frac14int_0^2pie^vcos(t+theta) mathrm dt.
                endalign*$$
                Because $tmapsto e^vcos t$ is $2pi$-periodic, we have
                $$
                int_0^2pie^vcos(t-theta) mathrm dt=int_0^2pie^vcos(t+theta) mathrm dt=int_0^2pie^vcos t mathrm dt
                $$
                so it follows that
                $$
                I_theta = frac 12int_0^2pie^vcos t mathrm dt =int_0^pi e^vcos t mathrm dt.
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Note that
                  $$beginalign*
                  I_theta &= frac14int_0^2pie^vcosthetacos tleft(e^vsinthetasin t+e^-vsinthetasin tright) mathrm dt\&=frac14int_0^2pie^vcos(t-theta) mathrm dt+frac14int_0^2pie^vcos(t+theta) mathrm dt.
                  endalign*$$
                  Because $tmapsto e^vcos t$ is $2pi$-periodic, we have
                  $$
                  int_0^2pie^vcos(t-theta) mathrm dt=int_0^2pie^vcos(t+theta) mathrm dt=int_0^2pie^vcos t mathrm dt
                  $$
                  so it follows that
                  $$
                  I_theta = frac 12int_0^2pie^vcos t mathrm dt =int_0^pi e^vcos t mathrm dt.
                  $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Note that
                  $$beginalign*
                  I_theta &= frac14int_0^2pie^vcosthetacos tleft(e^vsinthetasin t+e^-vsinthetasin tright) mathrm dt\&=frac14int_0^2pie^vcos(t-theta) mathrm dt+frac14int_0^2pie^vcos(t+theta) mathrm dt.
                  endalign*$$
                  Because $tmapsto e^vcos t$ is $2pi$-periodic, we have
                  $$
                  int_0^2pie^vcos(t-theta) mathrm dt=int_0^2pie^vcos(t+theta) mathrm dt=int_0^2pie^vcos t mathrm dt
                  $$
                  so it follows that
                  $$
                  I_theta = frac 12int_0^2pie^vcos t mathrm dt =int_0^pi e^vcos t mathrm dt.
                  $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 6 at 23:20









                  SimonSimon

                  1635




                  1635



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3138187%2fa-peculiar-integral-identity%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Can't initialize raids on a new ASUS Prime B360M-A motherboard2019 Community Moderator ElectionSimilar to RAID config yet more like mirroring solution?Can't get motherboard serial numberWhy does the BIOS entry point start with a WBINVD instruction?UEFI performance Asus Maximus V Extreme

                      Identity Server 4 is not redirecting to Angular app after login2019 Community Moderator ElectionIdentity Server 4 and dockerIdentityserver implicit flow unauthorized_clientIdentityServer Hybrid Flow - Access Token is null after user successful loginIdentity Server to MVC client : Page Redirect After loginLogin with Steam OpenId(oidc-client-js)Identity Server 4+.NET Core 2.0 + IdentityIdentityServer4 post-login redirect not working in Edge browserCall to IdentityServer4 generates System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an objectIdentityServer4 without HTTPS not workingHow to get Authorization code from identity server without login form

                      2005 Ahvaz unrest Contents Background Causes Casualties Aftermath See also References Navigation menue"At Least 10 Are Killed by Bombs in Iran""Iran"Archived"Arab-Iranians in Iran to make April 15 'Day of Fury'"State of Mind, State of Order: Reactions to Ethnic Unrest in the Islamic Republic of Iran.10.1111/j.1754-9469.2008.00028.x"Iran hangs Arab separatists"Iran Overview from ArchivedConstitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran"Tehran puzzled by forged 'riots' letter""Iran and its minorities: Down in the second class""Iran: Handling Of Ahvaz Unrest Could End With Televised Confessions""Bombings Rock Iran Ahead of Election""Five die in Iran ethnic clashes""Iran: Need for restraint as anniversary of unrest in Khuzestan approaches"Archived"Iranian Sunni protesters killed in clashes with security forces"Archived