JavaScript type conversion ==Which equals operator (== vs ===) should be used in JavaScript comparisons?Create GUID / UUID in JavaScript?How do JavaScript closures work?What is the most efficient way to deep clone an object in JavaScript?How do I remove a property from a JavaScript object?Which equals operator (== vs ===) should be used in JavaScript comparisons?How do I include a JavaScript file in another JavaScript file?What does “use strict” do in JavaScript, and what is the reasoning behind it?How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?How do I remove a particular element from an array in JavaScript?How to use foreach with array in JavaScript?

What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?

Factorio analysis: data munging

Is Social Media Science Fiction?

Schwarzschild Radius of the Universe

Divisibility of sum of multinomials

Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?

Why is "Reports" in sentence down without "The"

Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?

How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

Distance between two points on a map made for a game

LM317 - Calculate dissipation due voltage drop

Is there a way I can return more than one integer from a method?

Prevent a directory in /tmp from being deleted

Why do we use polarized capacitors?

What Brexit solution does the DUP want?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

Showing the closure of a compact subset need not be compact

Why has Russell's definition of numbers using equivalence classes been finally abandoned? ( If it has actually been abandoned).

What does "enim et" mean?

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

N.B. ligature in Latex

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?



JavaScript type conversion ==


Which equals operator (== vs ===) should be used in JavaScript comparisons?Create GUID / UUID in JavaScript?How do JavaScript closures work?What is the most efficient way to deep clone an object in JavaScript?How do I remove a property from a JavaScript object?Which equals operator (== vs ===) should be used in JavaScript comparisons?How do I include a JavaScript file in another JavaScript file?What does “use strict” do in JavaScript, and what is the reasoning behind it?How to check whether a string contains a substring in JavaScript?How do I remove a particular element from an array in JavaScript?How to use foreach with array in JavaScript?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








0















I recently read a post on reddit that said...




When you start learning JavaScript, you will likely read about never to use == but rather ===.




Which lead me to question:
Is there a time when it’s makes sense to use == rather than ===?



The author replied:




If you need to do type conversion. 420 == "420" evaluates to true.




While I could see how this could be useful if comparing the value of a text input to a number easily the same could be done using toString(). Just curious what other use cases the language designers had in mind? Any good examples of using this language feature properly rather than abusing it or negative behavior?










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Take a look at how lodash uses it in the isNil function (github.com/lodash/lodash/blob/master/isNil.js#L20). They are coercing both null and undefined to falsy. Otherwise they'd need to check both (i.e. value === null || value === undefined)

    – lux
    Mar 9 at 4:21






  • 2





    You’re right – it’s widely agreed on that it’s a bad idea to ever make use of ==’s type coercion except sometimes in the idiomatic case of == null (which means exactly === null || === undefined). As far as language design, well… lots of parts of JavaScript are mistakes in retrospect.

    – Ry-
    Mar 9 at 4:25











  • See stackoverflow.com/questions/359494/…

    – R. Schifini
    Mar 9 at 4:52






  • 1





    Actually strict equality and inequality operators weren't introduced until JavaScript 1.3. They are particularly suited to testing falsey values, e.g. to differentiate between null and undefined. They are not particularly suited to testing if an object value is an object, which is usually tested for using the truthyness of the value without use of comparison operators.

    – traktor53
    Mar 9 at 6:06


















0















I recently read a post on reddit that said...




When you start learning JavaScript, you will likely read about never to use == but rather ===.




Which lead me to question:
Is there a time when it’s makes sense to use == rather than ===?



The author replied:




If you need to do type conversion. 420 == "420" evaluates to true.




While I could see how this could be useful if comparing the value of a text input to a number easily the same could be done using toString(). Just curious what other use cases the language designers had in mind? Any good examples of using this language feature properly rather than abusing it or negative behavior?










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    Take a look at how lodash uses it in the isNil function (github.com/lodash/lodash/blob/master/isNil.js#L20). They are coercing both null and undefined to falsy. Otherwise they'd need to check both (i.e. value === null || value === undefined)

    – lux
    Mar 9 at 4:21






  • 2





    You’re right – it’s widely agreed on that it’s a bad idea to ever make use of ==’s type coercion except sometimes in the idiomatic case of == null (which means exactly === null || === undefined). As far as language design, well… lots of parts of JavaScript are mistakes in retrospect.

    – Ry-
    Mar 9 at 4:25











  • See stackoverflow.com/questions/359494/…

    – R. Schifini
    Mar 9 at 4:52






  • 1





    Actually strict equality and inequality operators weren't introduced until JavaScript 1.3. They are particularly suited to testing falsey values, e.g. to differentiate between null and undefined. They are not particularly suited to testing if an object value is an object, which is usually tested for using the truthyness of the value without use of comparison operators.

    – traktor53
    Mar 9 at 6:06














0












0








0








I recently read a post on reddit that said...




When you start learning JavaScript, you will likely read about never to use == but rather ===.




Which lead me to question:
Is there a time when it’s makes sense to use == rather than ===?



The author replied:




If you need to do type conversion. 420 == "420" evaluates to true.




While I could see how this could be useful if comparing the value of a text input to a number easily the same could be done using toString(). Just curious what other use cases the language designers had in mind? Any good examples of using this language feature properly rather than abusing it or negative behavior?










share|improve this question














I recently read a post on reddit that said...




When you start learning JavaScript, you will likely read about never to use == but rather ===.




Which lead me to question:
Is there a time when it’s makes sense to use == rather than ===?



The author replied:




If you need to do type conversion. 420 == "420" evaluates to true.




While I could see how this could be useful if comparing the value of a text input to a number easily the same could be done using toString(). Just curious what other use cases the language designers had in mind? Any good examples of using this language feature properly rather than abusing it or negative behavior?







javascript






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 9 at 4:02









Shane RayShane Ray

1,0851617




1,0851617







  • 1





    Take a look at how lodash uses it in the isNil function (github.com/lodash/lodash/blob/master/isNil.js#L20). They are coercing both null and undefined to falsy. Otherwise they'd need to check both (i.e. value === null || value === undefined)

    – lux
    Mar 9 at 4:21






  • 2





    You’re right – it’s widely agreed on that it’s a bad idea to ever make use of ==’s type coercion except sometimes in the idiomatic case of == null (which means exactly === null || === undefined). As far as language design, well… lots of parts of JavaScript are mistakes in retrospect.

    – Ry-
    Mar 9 at 4:25











  • See stackoverflow.com/questions/359494/…

    – R. Schifini
    Mar 9 at 4:52






  • 1





    Actually strict equality and inequality operators weren't introduced until JavaScript 1.3. They are particularly suited to testing falsey values, e.g. to differentiate between null and undefined. They are not particularly suited to testing if an object value is an object, which is usually tested for using the truthyness of the value without use of comparison operators.

    – traktor53
    Mar 9 at 6:06













  • 1





    Take a look at how lodash uses it in the isNil function (github.com/lodash/lodash/blob/master/isNil.js#L20). They are coercing both null and undefined to falsy. Otherwise they'd need to check both (i.e. value === null || value === undefined)

    – lux
    Mar 9 at 4:21






  • 2





    You’re right – it’s widely agreed on that it’s a bad idea to ever make use of ==’s type coercion except sometimes in the idiomatic case of == null (which means exactly === null || === undefined). As far as language design, well… lots of parts of JavaScript are mistakes in retrospect.

    – Ry-
    Mar 9 at 4:25











  • See stackoverflow.com/questions/359494/…

    – R. Schifini
    Mar 9 at 4:52






  • 1





    Actually strict equality and inequality operators weren't introduced until JavaScript 1.3. They are particularly suited to testing falsey values, e.g. to differentiate between null and undefined. They are not particularly suited to testing if an object value is an object, which is usually tested for using the truthyness of the value without use of comparison operators.

    – traktor53
    Mar 9 at 6:06








1




1





Take a look at how lodash uses it in the isNil function (github.com/lodash/lodash/blob/master/isNil.js#L20). They are coercing both null and undefined to falsy. Otherwise they'd need to check both (i.e. value === null || value === undefined)

– lux
Mar 9 at 4:21





Take a look at how lodash uses it in the isNil function (github.com/lodash/lodash/blob/master/isNil.js#L20). They are coercing both null and undefined to falsy. Otherwise they'd need to check both (i.e. value === null || value === undefined)

– lux
Mar 9 at 4:21




2




2





You’re right – it’s widely agreed on that it’s a bad idea to ever make use of ==’s type coercion except sometimes in the idiomatic case of == null (which means exactly === null || === undefined). As far as language design, well… lots of parts of JavaScript are mistakes in retrospect.

– Ry-
Mar 9 at 4:25





You’re right – it’s widely agreed on that it’s a bad idea to ever make use of ==’s type coercion except sometimes in the idiomatic case of == null (which means exactly === null || === undefined). As far as language design, well… lots of parts of JavaScript are mistakes in retrospect.

– Ry-
Mar 9 at 4:25













See stackoverflow.com/questions/359494/…

– R. Schifini
Mar 9 at 4:52





See stackoverflow.com/questions/359494/…

– R. Schifini
Mar 9 at 4:52




1




1





Actually strict equality and inequality operators weren't introduced until JavaScript 1.3. They are particularly suited to testing falsey values, e.g. to differentiate between null and undefined. They are not particularly suited to testing if an object value is an object, which is usually tested for using the truthyness of the value without use of comparison operators.

– traktor53
Mar 9 at 6:06






Actually strict equality and inequality operators weren't introduced until JavaScript 1.3. They are particularly suited to testing falsey values, e.g. to differentiate between null and undefined. They are not particularly suited to testing if an object value is an object, which is usually tested for using the truthyness of the value without use of comparison operators.

– traktor53
Mar 9 at 6:06













0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55073861%2fjavascript-type-conversion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55073861%2fjavascript-type-conversion%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Identity Server 4 is not redirecting to Angular app after login2019 Community Moderator ElectionIdentity Server 4 and dockerIdentityserver implicit flow unauthorized_clientIdentityServer Hybrid Flow - Access Token is null after user successful loginIdentity Server to MVC client : Page Redirect After loginLogin with Steam OpenId(oidc-client-js)Identity Server 4+.NET Core 2.0 + IdentityIdentityServer4 post-login redirect not working in Edge browserCall to IdentityServer4 generates System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an objectIdentityServer4 without HTTPS not workingHow to get Authorization code from identity server without login form

2005 Ahvaz unrest Contents Background Causes Casualties Aftermath See also References Navigation menue"At Least 10 Are Killed by Bombs in Iran""Iran"Archived"Arab-Iranians in Iran to make April 15 'Day of Fury'"State of Mind, State of Order: Reactions to Ethnic Unrest in the Islamic Republic of Iran.10.1111/j.1754-9469.2008.00028.x"Iran hangs Arab separatists"Iran Overview from ArchivedConstitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran"Tehran puzzled by forged 'riots' letter""Iran and its minorities: Down in the second class""Iran: Handling Of Ahvaz Unrest Could End With Televised Confessions""Bombings Rock Iran Ahead of Election""Five die in Iran ethnic clashes""Iran: Need for restraint as anniversary of unrest in Khuzestan approaches"Archived"Iranian Sunni protesters killed in clashes with security forces"Archived

Can't initialize raids on a new ASUS Prime B360M-A motherboard2019 Community Moderator ElectionSimilar to RAID config yet more like mirroring solution?Can't get motherboard serial numberWhy does the BIOS entry point start with a WBINVD instruction?UEFI performance Asus Maximus V Extreme